LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LFST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFST | $7.41 | -3.01% | 2.9B | 123.50 | $0.06 | N/A |
| HCA | $372.13 | +2.85% | 82.5B | 12.82 | $29.02 | +0.79% |
| SOLV | $81.01 | -1.71% | 14B | 9.92 | $8.17 | N/A |
| THC | $162.06 | +0.43% | 14B | 8.43 | $19.24 | N/A |
| DVA | $192.16 | -0.01% | 12.3B | 18.50 | $10.38 | N/A |
| FMS | $22.03 | +0.46% | 11.8B | 11.59 | $1.90 | +3.94% |
| EHC | $104.01 | +4.18% | 10.3B | 17.82 | $5.84 | +0.71% |
| ENSG | $170.30 | +3.66% | 10B | 27.74 | $6.14 | +0.15% |
| OSH | $39.00 | +0.08% | 9.5B | -17.65 | -$2.21 | N/A |
| UHS | $145.17 | +1.72% | 9.1B | 6.06 | $23.95 | +0.55% |
Stock Comparison
LFST vs HCA Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HCA has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while HCA trades at $372.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas HCA's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HCA's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to HCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check HCA's competition here
LFST vs SOLV Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SOLV has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while SOLV trades at $81.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas SOLV's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOLV's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to SOLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check SOLV's competition here
LFST vs THC Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, THC has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while THC trades at $162.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas THC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to THC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check THC's competition here
LFST vs DVA Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DVA has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while DVA trades at $192.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas DVA's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to DVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check DVA's competition here
LFST vs FMS Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FMS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while FMS trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas FMS's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to FMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check FMS's competition here
LFST vs EHC Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EHC has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while EHC trades at $104.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas EHC's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EHC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to EHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check EHC's competition here
LFST vs ENSG Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ENSG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while ENSG trades at $170.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas ENSG's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENSG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to ENSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check ENSG's competition here
LFST vs OSH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OSH has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while OSH trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas OSH's P/E ratio is -17.65. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OSH's ROE of +4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to OSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check OSH's competition here
LFST vs UHS Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UHS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while UHS trades at $145.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas UHS's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UHS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to UHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check UHS's competition here
LFST vs CHE Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CHE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while CHE trades at $441.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas CHE's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to CHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check CHE's competition here
LFST vs LHCG Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LHCG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while LHCG trades at $169.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas LHCG's P/E ratio is 82.83. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LHCG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to LHCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check LHCG's competition here
LFST vs MMED Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MMED has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while MMED trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas MMED's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMED's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to MMED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check MMED's competition here
LFST vs AMED Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMED has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AMED trades at $100.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AMED's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to AMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AMED's competition here
LFST vs OPCH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OPCH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while OPCH trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas OPCH's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OPCH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to OPCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check OPCH's competition here
LFST vs NHC Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NHC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while NHC trades at $192.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas NHC's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to NHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check NHC's competition here
LFST vs BKD Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BKD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while BKD trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas BKD's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BKD's ROE of +401.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to BKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check BKD's competition here
LFST vs ACHC Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ACHC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while ACHC trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas ACHC's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACHC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to ACHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check ACHC's competition here
LFST vs SEM Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SEM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while SEM trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas SEM's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to SEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check SEM's competition here
LFST vs ASTH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASTH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while ASTH trades at $37.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas ASTH's P/E ratio is 62.28. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to ASTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check ASTH's competition here
LFST vs MD Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while MD trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas MD's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to MD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check MD's competition here
LFST vs AMEH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMEH has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AMEH trades at $40.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AMEH's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMEH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to AMEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AMEH's competition here
LFST vs SGRY Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SGRY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while SGRY trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas SGRY's P/E ratio is -23.24. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGRY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to SGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check SGRY's competition here
LFST vs ADUS Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADUS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while ADUS trades at $92.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas ADUS's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADUS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to ADUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check ADUS's competition here
LFST vs AGL Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AGL trades at $96.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AGL's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AGL's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to AGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AGL's competition here
LFST vs AVAH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AVAH has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AVAH trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AVAH's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVAH's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to AVAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AVAH's competition here
LFST vs HCSG Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HCSG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while HCSG trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas HCSG's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HCSG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to HCSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check HCSG's competition here
LFST vs ARDT Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while ARDT trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas ARDT's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARDT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to ARDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check ARDT's competition here
LFST vs BKDT Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BKDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while BKDT trades at $77.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas BKDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BKDT's ROE of +401.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to BKDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check BKDT's competition here
LFST vs AMN Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AMN trades at $31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AMN's P/E ratio is -36.81. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to AMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AMN's competition here
LFST vs CMPS Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CMPS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while CMPS trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas CMPS's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMPS's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to CMPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check CMPS's competition here
LFST vs PNTG Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PNTG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while PNTG trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas PNTG's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PNTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to PNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check PNTG's competition here
LFST vs INNV Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, INNV has a market cap of 990.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while INNV trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas INNV's P/E ratio is -91.25. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INNV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to INNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check INNV's competition here
LFST vs USPH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, USPH has a market cap of 966.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while USPH trades at $63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas USPH's P/E ratio is 127.00. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USPH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to USPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check USPH's competition here
LFST vs TALK Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TALK has a market cap of 874.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while TALK trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas TALK's P/E ratio is 130.50. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TALK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to TALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check TALK's competition here
LFST vs FSHCX Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FSHCX has a market cap of 806.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while FSHCX trades at $109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas FSHCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to FSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check FSHCX's competition here
LFST vs EHAB Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EHAB has a market cap of 706.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while EHAB trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas EHAB's P/E ratio is -197.14. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EHAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to EHAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check EHAB's competition here
LFST vs SNDA Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SNDA has a market cap of 687.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while SNDA trades at $34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas SNDA's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNDA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to SNDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check SNDA's competition here
LFST vs GMRS Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GMRS has a market cap of 498.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while GMRS trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas GMRS's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GMRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to GMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check GMRS's competition here
LFST vs TOI Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TOI has a market cap of 486.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while TOI trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas TOI's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOI's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to TOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check TOI's competition here
LFST vs MCTA Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MCTA has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while MCTA trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas MCTA's P/E ratio is 419.36. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCTA's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to MCTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check MCTA's competition here
LFST vs CCRN Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CCRN has a market cap of 426.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while CCRN trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas CCRN's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCRN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to CCRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check CCRN's competition here
LFST vs CYH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CYH has a market cap of 386.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while CYH trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas CYH's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CYH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to CYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check CYH's competition here
LFST vs AIRS Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AIRS has a market cap of 360.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AIRS trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AIRS's P/E ratio is -30.06. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to AIRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AIRS's competition here
LFST vs AONC Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AONC has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AONC trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AONC's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AONC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to AONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AONC's competition here
LFST vs AUNA Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AUNA has a market cap of 327.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AUNA trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AUNA's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to AUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AUNA's competition here
LFST vs CSU Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CSU has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while CSU trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas CSU's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSU's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to CSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check CSU's competition here
LFST vs JYNT Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JYNT has a market cap of 118.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while JYNT trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas JYNT's P/E ratio is 92.11. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JYNT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to JYNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check JYNT's competition here
LFST vs NAKAW Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NAKAW has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while NAKAW trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas NAKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAKAW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to NAKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check NAKAW's competition here
LFST vs BTMD Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BTMD has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while BTMD trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas BTMD's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTMD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to BTMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check BTMD's competition here
LFST vs FVE Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FVE has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while FVE trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas FVE's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FVE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to FVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check FVE's competition here
LFST vs KDLYW Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KDLYW has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while KDLYW trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas KDLYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KDLYW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to KDLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check KDLYW's competition here
LFST vs DCGO Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DCGO has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while DCGO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas DCGO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCGO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to DCGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check DCGO's competition here
LFST vs ALR Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALR has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while ALR trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas ALR's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to ALR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check ALR's competition here
LFST vs PIII Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PIII has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while PIII trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas PIII's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIII's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to PIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check PIII's competition here
LFST vs IMAC Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IMAC has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while IMAC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas IMAC's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMAC's ROE of +1183.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to IMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check IMAC's competition here
LFST vs CCEL Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CCEL has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while CCEL trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas CCEL's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to CCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check CCEL's competition here
LFST vs CANO-WT Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CANO-WT has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while CANO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas CANO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CANO-WT's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to CANO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check CANO-WT's competition here
LFST vs AIH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AIH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AIH trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AIH's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIH's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to AIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AIH's competition here
LFST vs CANO Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CANO has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while CANO trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas CANO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CANO's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to CANO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check CANO's competition here
LFST vs FTRP Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FTRP has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while FTRP trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas FTRP's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTRP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to FTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check FTRP's competition here
LFST vs AMS Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMS has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AMS trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AMS's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to AMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AMS's competition here
LFST vs MODV Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MODV has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while MODV trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas MODV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MODV's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to MODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check MODV's competition here
LFST vs GBNH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GBNH has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while GBNH trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas GBNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GBNH's ROE of +15.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to GBNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check GBNH's competition here
LFST vs SYRA Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SYRA has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while SYRA trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas SYRA's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYRA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to SYRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check SYRA's competition here
LFST vs RHE-PA Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RHE-PA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while RHE-PA trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas RHE-PA's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHE-PA's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to RHE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check RHE-PA's competition here
LFST vs RHE Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RHE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while RHE trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas RHE's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to RHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check RHE's competition here
LFST vs TOIIW Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TOIIW has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while TOIIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas TOIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOIIW's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to TOIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check TOIIW's competition here
LFST vs ATIP Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATIP has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while ATIP trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas ATIP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATIP's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to ATIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check ATIP's competition here
LFST vs IMACW Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IMACW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while IMACW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas IMACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMACW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to IMACW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check IMACW's competition here
LFST vs CCM Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CCM has a market cap of 685.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while CCM trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas CCM's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to CCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check CCM's competition here
LFST vs MNDR Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MNDR has a market cap of 620K. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while MNDR trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas MNDR's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNDR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to MNDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check MNDR's competition here
LFST vs TALKW Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TALKW has a market cap of 435.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while TALKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas TALKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TALKW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to TALKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check TALKW's competition here
LFST vs NVOS Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVOS has a market cap of 394.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while NVOS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas NVOS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NVOS's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to NVOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check NVOS's competition here
LFST vs NIVF Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NIVF has a market cap of 352.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while NIVF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas NIVF's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIVF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to NIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check NIVF's competition here
LFST vs BACK Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BACK has a market cap of 162.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while BACK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas BACK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BACK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to BACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check BACK's competition here
LFST vs PIIIW Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PIIIW has a market cap of 55.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while PIIIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas PIIIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIIIW's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to PIIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check PIIIW's competition here
LFST vs NIVFW Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NIVFW has a market cap of 45.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while NIVFW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas NIVFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIVFW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to NIVFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check NIVFW's competition here
LFST vs IONM Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IONM has a market cap of 313. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while IONM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas IONM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IONM's ROE of +5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to IONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check IONM's competition here
LFST vs KND Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while KND trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas KND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KND's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to KND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check KND's competition here
LFST vs TVTY Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TVTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while TVTY trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas TVTY's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TVTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to TVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check TVTY's competition here
LFST vs SLHG Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SLHG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while SLHG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas SLHG's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to SLHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check SLHG's competition here
LFST vs AFAM Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AFAM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while AFAM trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas AFAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFAM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to AFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check AFAM's competition here
LFST vs TLMDW Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TLMDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while TLMDW trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas TLMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TLMDW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to TLMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check TLMDW's competition here
LFST vs HNGR Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HNGR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while HNGR trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas HNGR's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HNGR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to HNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check HNGR's competition here
LFST vs DVCR Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DVCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while DVCR trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas DVCR's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DVCR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to DVCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check DVCR's competition here
LFST vs NFH Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NFH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while NFH trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas NFH's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to NFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check NFH's competition here
LFST vs SLHGP Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SLHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while SLHGP trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas SLHGP's P/E ratio is -30.38. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLHGP's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to SLHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check SLHGP's competition here
LFST vs TLMD Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TLMD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while TLMD trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas TLMD's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TLMD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is more volatile compared to TLMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check TLMD's competition here
LFST vs DCGOW Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DCGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while DCGOW trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas DCGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCGOW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to DCGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check DCGOW's competition here
LFST vs ATIP-WT Comparison June 2026
LFST plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFST stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATIP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LFST is priced at $7.41, while ATIP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFST currently has a P/E ratio of 123.50, whereas ATIP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFST's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATIP-WT's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFST is less volatile compared to ATIP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFST.Check ATIP-WT's competition here