Kennametal Inc. (KMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMT | $32.63 | -0.82% | 2.5B | 18.33 | $1.78 | +2.47% |
| SNA | $379.77 | +0.23% | 19.7B | 19.61 | $19.37 | +2.50% |
| RBC | $590.09 | +0.06% | 18.7B | 64.79 | $9.11 | N/A |
| LECO | $262.13 | -0.65% | 14.4B | 27.08 | $9.68 | +1.18% |
| SWK | $78.48 | -1.05% | 12.2B | 32.16 | $2.44 | +4.25% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 11.6B | 21.57 | $5.79 | N/A |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TKR | $131.83 | -1.37% | 9.2B | 29.90 | $4.41 | +1.08% |
| TTC | $87.21 | -1.82% | 8.5B | 25.12 | $3.47 | +1.78% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KMT vs SNA Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while SNA trades at $379.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SNA's competition here
KMT vs RBC Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while RBC trades at $590.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 64.79. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check RBC's competition here
KMT vs LECO Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while LECO trades at $262.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check LECO's competition here
KMT vs SWK Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while SWK trades at $78.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 32.16. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWK's competition here
KMT vs SWH Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWH's competition here
KMT vs ROLLP Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check ROLLP's competition here
KMT vs TKR Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while TKR trades at $131.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TKR's competition here
KMT vs TTC Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while TTC trades at $87.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TTC's competition here
KMT vs ROLL Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check ROLL's competition here
KMT vs RBCP Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check RBCP's competition here
KMT vs HLMN Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while HLMN trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 40.56. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check HLMN's competition here
KMT vs EML Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while EML trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EML's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check EML's competition here
KMT vs SCX Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SCX's competition here
KMT vs SCAG Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SCAG has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while SCAG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas SCAG's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SCAG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SCAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SCAG's competition here
KMT vs PFIN Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check PFIN's competition here
KMT vs CVR Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while CVR trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check CVR's competition here
KMT vs TBLT Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 722. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while TBLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TBLT's competition here
KMT vs TBLTW Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TBLTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while TBLTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas TBLTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBLTW's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TBLTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check TBLTW's competition here
KMT vs SWT Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SWT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while SWT trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas SWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check SWT's competition here
KMT vs HDNG Comparison June 2026
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HDNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $32.63, while HDNG trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.33, whereas HDNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to HDNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.Check HDNG's competition here