Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RCB trades at $25.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RCB's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NLY-PI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NLY-PI's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NLY trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NLY's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RITM-PA trades at $25.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RITM-PB trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM-PB's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NLY-PG trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NLY-PG's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RITM-PD trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM-PD's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RITM-PC trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NLY-PF trades at $25.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NLY-PF's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while AGNC trades at $10.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while AGNCO trades at $25.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCO's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while AGNCP trades at $25.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCP's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while AGNCL trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCL's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while AGNCM trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCM's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while AGNCN trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.84. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AGNCN's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while STWD trades at $17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check STWD's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NRZ trades at $10.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NRZ's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RITM trades at $9.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RITM's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PE's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ABR-PF trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ABR-PF's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RCD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RCD trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RCD's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RCD's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ABR-PD trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ABR-PD's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while BXMT trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BXMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check BXMT's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RWTN trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWTN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RWTN's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ABR-PE trades at $15.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ABR-PE's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RWTQ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RWTQ trades at $24.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RWTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RWTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RWTQ's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RWT-PA trades at $24.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RWT-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while EFC-PC trades at $25.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while TWO-PC trades at $24.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TWO-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while TWO-PA trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 44.99. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TWO-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while TWO-PB trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 44.72. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TWO-PB's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while MFAN trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFAN's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while MFAO trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFAO's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while EFC-PB trades at $24.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PB's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while EFC-PD trades at $23.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PD's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while MFA-PC trades at $23.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFA-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ADAMH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ADAMH trades at $25.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ADAMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADAMH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ADAMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ADAMH's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NYMTH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NYMTH trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NYMTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NYMTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NYMTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTH's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ADAMI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ADAMI trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ADAMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADAMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ADAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ADAMI's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ADAMM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ADAMM trades at $25.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ADAMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADAMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ADAMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ADAMM's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NYMTM trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 531.49. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTM's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while PMTU trades at $25.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check PMTU's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ADAMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ADAMN trades at $23.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ADAMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADAMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ADAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ADAMN's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ARR trades at $17.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ARR's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RC-PC trades at $12.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RC-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, CIMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while CIMN trades at $25.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas CIMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIMN's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RC-PE trades at $12.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RC-PE's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while MFA-PB trades at $20.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFA-PB's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, CIMP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while CIMP trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas CIMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to CIMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIMP's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while DX trades at $12.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check DX's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while IVR-PC trades at $23.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check IVR-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while DX-PC trades at $25.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check DX-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while FBRT-PE trades at $19.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -11.46. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check FBRT-PE's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while PMT-PC trades at $18.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -24.95. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check PMT-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while TRTX-PC trades at $18.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TRTX-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ARI trades at $10.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ARI's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ARR-PC trades at $20.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ARR-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while EFC trades at $13.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTO's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while TWO trades at $12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TWO's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while KREF-PA trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check KREF-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, SCCG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while SCCG trades at $24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas SCCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCCG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to SCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check SCCG's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while SCCC trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check SCCC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while CIM trades at $13.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while CIM-PC trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while CIM-PD trades at $24.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM-PD's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while CIM-PB trades at $24.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM-PB's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while CIM-PA trades at $21.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CIM-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ABR trades at $5.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ABR's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ORC trades at $6.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ORC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 997.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while PMT-PB trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -31.05. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check PMT-PB's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 996.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while LFT-PA trades at $19.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 83.17. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check LFT-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 994.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while PMT-PA trades at $22.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check PMT-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 966.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while SACH-PA trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 47.80. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check SACH-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 945.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while MFA trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MFA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 932.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while GPMT-PA trades at $19.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check GPMT-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 889M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while PMT trades at $10.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check PMT's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, CHMI-PA has a market cap of 821.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while CHMI-PA trades at $22.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas CHMI-PA's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHMI-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to CHMI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CHMI-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ADAM has a market cap of 817.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ADAM trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ADAM's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to ADAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ADAM's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 806.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while MITN trades at $25.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MITN's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, MITP has a market cap of 801.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while MITP trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas MITP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MITP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MITP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MITP's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 765.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while MITT-PC trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MITT-PC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 666.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RWT trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RWT's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while EFC-PA trades at $12.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check EFC-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 658.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while FBRT trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check FBRT's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 653.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while TRTX trades at $8.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check TRTX's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NYMT trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMT's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while BRMK trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check BRMK's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 633.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NYMTZ trades at $18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 396.39. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTZ's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while AIC trades at $24.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIC's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check AIC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NYMTN trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 460.96. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTN's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NYMTL's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 456.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NREF-PA trades at $24.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NREF-PA's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while KREF trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check KREF's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 356.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while CMTG trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check CMTG's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while NREF trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check NREF's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 285M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while RC trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check RC's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 280.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while ACRE trades at $5.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -14.03. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check ACRE's competition here

IVR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IVR stands at 563.8M. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 245.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IVR is priced at $7.83, while MITT trades at $7.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IVR currently has a P/E ratio of 10.09, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, IVR's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVR is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVR.Check MITT's competition here