Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRT | $16.70 | +2.90% | 3.9B | 82.75 | $0.20 | +4.14% |
| AVB | $190.03 | +3.73% | 26.3B | 23.45 | $8.07 | +3.76% |
| EQR | $68.39 | +3.40% | 25.4B | 27.16 | $2.50 | +4.14% |
| ESS | $286.54 | +3.15% | 18.3B | 32.01 | $8.89 | +3.65% |
| INVH | $30.04 | +3.64% | 17.5B | 31.04 | $0.95 | +4.04% |
| MAA-PI | $54.50 | -1.44% | 16.1B | 10.59 | $5.15 | +4.50% |
| MAA | $137.94 | +4.07% | 15.9B | 41.38 | $3.31 | +4.50% |
| SUI | $123.58 | +2.53% | 15.1B | -250.37 | -$0.49 | +6.81% |
| AMH-PG | $23.46 | +0.84% | 13B | 47.82 | $0.48 | +3.77% |
| AMH-PH | $23.91 | +0.73% | 12.9B | 49.46 | $0.48 | +3.77% |
Stock Comparison
IRT vs AVB Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AVB has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while AVB trades at $190.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas AVB's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AVB's competition here
IRT vs EQR Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EQR has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while EQR trades at $68.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas EQR's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to EQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check EQR's competition here
IRT vs ESS Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ESS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while ESS trades at $286.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas ESS's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ESS's competition here
IRT vs INVH Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, INVH has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while INVH trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas INVH's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INVH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to INVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check INVH's competition here
IRT vs MAA-PI Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MAA-PI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while MAA-PI trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas MAA-PI's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAA-PI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to MAA-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MAA-PI's competition here
IRT vs MAA Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MAA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while MAA trades at $137.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas MAA's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to MAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MAA's competition here
IRT vs SUI Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SUI has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while SUI trades at $123.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas SUI's P/E ratio is -250.37. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to SUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check SUI's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PG Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMH-PG has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while AMH-PG trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas AMH-PG's P/E ratio is 47.82. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AMH-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PG's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PH Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMH-PH has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while AMH-PH trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas AMH-PH's P/E ratio is 49.46. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PH's competition here
IRT vs UDR Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UDR has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while UDR trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas UDR's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UDR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to UDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UDR's competition here
IRT vs ELS Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ELS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while ELS trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas ELS's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to ELS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ELS's competition here
IRT vs AMH Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMH has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while AMH trades at $33.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas AMH's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH's competition here
IRT vs CPT Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CPT has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while CPT trades at $112.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas CPT's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CPT's competition here
IRT vs AIRC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AIRC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while AIRC trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas AIRC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIRC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AIRC's competition here
IRT vs MRP Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MRP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while MRP trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas MRP's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to MRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MRP's competition here
IRT vs VRE Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while VRE trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas VRE's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VRE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to VRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check VRE's competition here
IRT vs UMH-PD Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UMH-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while UMH-PD trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas UMH-PD's P/E ratio is 112.87. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMH-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to UMH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH-PD's competition here
IRT vs UMH Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UMH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while UMH trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas UMH's P/E ratio is 150.70. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to UMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH's competition here
IRT vs CSR Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CSR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while CSR trades at $59.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas CSR's P/E ratio is 127.61. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CSR's competition here
IRT vs CSR-PC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CSR-PC has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while CSR-PC trades at $84.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas CSR-PC's P/E ratio is -117.54. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSR-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CSR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CSR-PC's competition here
IRT vs NXRT Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NXRT has a market cap of 731.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while NXRT trades at $29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas NXRT's P/E ratio is -22.87. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to NXRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check NXRT's competition here
IRT vs AIV Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AIV has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while AIV trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas AIV's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIV's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AIV's competition here
IRT vs BRT Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BRT has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while BRT trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas BRT's P/E ratio is -22.17. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to BRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRT's competition here
IRT vs SUNS Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SUNS has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while SUNS trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas SUNS's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to SUNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check SUNS's competition here
IRT vs CLPR Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CLPR has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while CLPR trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas CLPR's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLPR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CLPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CLPR's competition here
IRT vs BHM Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BHM has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while BHM trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas BHM's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to BHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BHM's competition here
IRT vs BRG-PD Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BRG-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while BRG-PD trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas BRG-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRG-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG-PD's competition here
IRT vs ACC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ACC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while ACC trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas ACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ACC's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PF Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMH-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while AMH-PF trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas AMH-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PF's competition here
IRT vs BRG-PC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BRG-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while BRG-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas BRG-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRG-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG-PC's competition here
IRT vs BRG Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BRG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while BRG trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas BRG's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG's competition here
IRT vs UMH-PC Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UMH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while UMH-PC trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas UMH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMH-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to UMH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH-PC's competition here
IRT vs PPS Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PPS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while PPS trades at $65.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas PPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to PPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check PPS's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PE Comparison June 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMH-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $16.70, while AMH-PE trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 82.75, whereas AMH-PE's P/E ratio is 83.30. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PE's competition here