Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC (HKMPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HKMPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKMPF | $19.29 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 10.66 | $1.81 | +4.35% |
| MKGAF | $158.31 | -3.30% | 68.1B | 23.03 | $6.80 | +1.57% |
| MKKGY | $31.32 | -3.48% | 68.1B | 23.03 | $1.36 | +1.64% |
| IPSEY | $45.04 | +2.71% | 59.6B | 29.06 | $1.55 | +1.03% |
| TKPHF | $30.47 | +0.00% | 48.1B | 40.63 | $0.75 | +4.28% |
| HLNCF | $4.51 | +1.72% | 39.9B | 18.04 | $0.25 | +2.13% |
| TEVJF | $30.34 | +0.50% | 35.3B | 22.64 | $1.34 | N/A |
| SDZNY | $80.28 | -0.68% | 34.8B | 38.44 | $2.09 | +1.26% |
| TAIPY | $14.00 | +16.67% | 18.1B | 82.35 | $0.17 | N/A |
| ESALY | $61.51 | -2.11% | 17.6B | 20.54 | $3.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HKMPF vs MKGAF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MKGAF has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while MKGAF trades at $158.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas MKGAF's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKGAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to MKGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check MKGAF's competition here
HKMPF vs MKKGY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MKKGY has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while MKKGY trades at $31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas MKKGY's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKKGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to MKKGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check MKKGY's competition here
HKMPF vs IPSEY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IPSEY has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while IPSEY trades at $45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas IPSEY's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPSEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to IPSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check IPSEY's competition here
HKMPF vs TKPHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TKPHF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while TKPHF trades at $30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TKPHF's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TKPHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to TKPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check TKPHF's competition here
HKMPF vs HLNCF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HLNCF has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while HLNCF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas HLNCF's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLNCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to HLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check HLNCF's competition here
HKMPF vs TEVJF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TEVJF has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while TEVJF trades at $30.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TEVJF's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TEVJF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to TEVJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check TEVJF's competition here
HKMPF vs SDZNY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SDZNY has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SDZNY trades at $80.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SDZNY's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDZNY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to SDZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SDZNY's competition here
HKMPF vs TAIPY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TAIPY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while TAIPY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TAIPY's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TAIPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to TAIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check TAIPY's competition here
HKMPF vs ESALY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESALY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while ESALY trades at $61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ESALY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESALY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to ESALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check ESALY's competition here
HKMPF vs BIOVF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BIOVF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while BIOVF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BIOVF's P/E ratio is 171.43. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIOVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to BIOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check BIOVF's competition here
HKMPF vs SGIOY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGIOY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SGIOY trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SGIOY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGIOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to SGIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SGIOY's competition here
HKMPF vs SGIOF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGIOF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SGIOF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SGIOF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGIOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to SGIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SGIOF's competition here
HKMPF vs IPSEF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IPSEF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while IPSEF trades at $113.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas IPSEF's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPSEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to IPSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check IPSEF's competition here
HKMPF vs ESALF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESALF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while ESALF trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ESALF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESALF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to ESALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check ESALF's competition here
HKMPF vs BCHMF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while BCHMF trades at $87.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check BCHMF's competition here
HKMPF vs ESAIY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESAIY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while ESAIY trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ESAIY's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESAIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to ESAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check ESAIY's competition here
HKMPF vs HLUBF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HLUBF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while HLUBF trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas HLUBF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLUBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to HLUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check HLUBF's competition here
HKMPF vs GZPHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GZPHF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while GZPHF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas GZPHF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GZPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to GZPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check GZPHF's competition here
HKMPF vs LVZPF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LVZPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while LVZPF trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas LVZPF's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LVZPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to LVZPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check LVZPF's competition here
HKMPF vs HLBBF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HLBBF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while HLBBF trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas HLBBF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLBBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to HLBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check HLBBF's competition here
HKMPF vs SFOSF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SFOSF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SFOSF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SFOSF's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFOSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to SFOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SFOSF's competition here
HKMPF vs LABFF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LABFF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while LABFF trades at $90.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas LABFF's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LABFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to LABFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check LABFF's competition here
HKMPF vs SMDPY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SMDPY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SMDPY trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SMDPY's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMDPY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to SMDPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SMDPY's competition here
HKMPF vs SGFEF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SGFEF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SGFEF trades at $100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SGFEF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGFEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to SGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SGFEF's competition here
HKMPF vs HKMPY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HKMPY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while HKMPY trades at $39.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas HKMPY's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HKMPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to HKMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check HKMPY's competition here
HKMPF vs DNPUF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DNPUF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while DNPUF trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas DNPUF's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNPUF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to DNPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check DNPUF's competition here
HKMPF vs APNHY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APNHY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while APNHY trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas APNHY's P/E ratio is -35.48. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APNHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to APNHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check APNHY's competition here
HKMPF vs APNHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APNHF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while APNHF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas APNHF's P/E ratio is -34.80. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APNHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to APNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check APNHF's competition here
HKMPF vs CAMRF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CAMRF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CAMRF trades at $59.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CAMRF's P/E ratio is 48.93. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAMRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to CAMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CAMRF's competition here
HKMPF vs LBTSF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LBTSF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while LBTSF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas LBTSF's P/E ratio is 59.04. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LBTSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to LBTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check LBTSF's competition here
HKMPF vs CHSYF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHSYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CHSYF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CHSYF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHSYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to CHSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CHSYF's competition here
HKMPF vs INVVY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INVVY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while INVVY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas INVVY's P/E ratio is -62.42. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INVVY's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to INVVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check INVVY's competition here
HKMPF vs HYPMY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HYPMY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while HYPMY trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas HYPMY's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYPMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to HYPMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check HYPMY's competition here
HKMPF vs IZQVF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IZQVF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while IZQVF trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas IZQVF's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IZQVF's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to IZQVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check IZQVF's competition here
HKMPF vs CURLF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CURLF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CURLF trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CURLF's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CURLF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to CURLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CURLF's competition here
HKMPF vs ULIHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ULIHF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while ULIHF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ULIHF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ULIHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to ULIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check ULIHF's competition here
HKMPF vs TCNNF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TCNNF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while TCNNF trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TCNNF's P/E ratio is -29.45. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCNNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to TCNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check TCNNF's competition here
HKMPF vs NPNKF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NPNKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while NPNKF trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas NPNKF's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPNKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to NPNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check NPNKF's competition here
HKMPF vs HTSUF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HTSUF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while HTSUF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas HTSUF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HTSUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to HTSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check HTSUF's competition here
HKMPF vs DMPHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DMPHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while DMPHF trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas DMPHF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMPHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to DMPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check DMPHF's competition here
HKMPF vs ARSUF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ARSUF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while ARSUF trades at $26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ARSUF's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARSUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to ARSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check ARSUF's competition here
HKMPF vs DUTV Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DUTV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while DUTV trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas DUTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DUTV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to DUTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check DUTV's competition here
HKMPF vs GTBIF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTBIF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while GTBIF trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas GTBIF's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTBIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to GTBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check GTBIF's competition here
HKMPF vs HMDCF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HMDCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while HMDCF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas HMDCF's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HMDCF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to HMDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check HMDCF's competition here
HKMPF vs TSMRF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TSMRF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while TSMRF trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TSMRF's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to TSMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check TSMRF's competition here
HKMPF vs SHPHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SHPHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SHPHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SHPHF's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHPHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to SHPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SHPHF's competition here
HKMPF vs NPPNY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NPPNY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while NPPNY trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas NPPNY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPPNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to NPPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check NPPNY's competition here
HKMPF vs MITPF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MITPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while MITPF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas MITPF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MITPF's ROE of +4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to MITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check MITPF's competition here
HKMPF vs CMOPF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CMOPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CMOPF trades at $91.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CMOPF's P/E ratio is -350.54. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMOPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to CMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CMOPF's competition here
HKMPF vs KARBF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KARBF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while KARBF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas KARBF's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KARBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to KARBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check KARBF's competition here
HKMPF vs SWGHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SWGHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SWGHF trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SWGHF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWGHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to SWGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SWGHF's competition here
HKMPF vs EVOTF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EVOTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while EVOTF trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas EVOTF's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVOTF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to EVOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check EVOTF's competition here
HKMPF vs LJUIF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LJUIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while LJUIF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas LJUIF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LJUIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to LJUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check LJUIF's competition here
HKMPF vs BIOGY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BIOGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while BIOGY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BIOGY's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIOGY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to BIOGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check BIOGY's competition here
HKMPF vs CHIZF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHIZF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CHIZF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CHIZF's P/E ratio is -21.89. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHIZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to CHIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CHIZF's competition here
HKMPF vs CASBF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CASBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CASBF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CASBF's P/E ratio is 155.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CASBF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to CASBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CASBF's competition here
HKMPF vs KSPHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KSPHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while KSPHF trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas KSPHF's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KSPHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to KSPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check KSPHF's competition here
HKMPF vs GNMLF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GNMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while GNMLF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas GNMLF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNMLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to GNMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check GNMLF's competition here
HKMPF vs KKPCF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KKPCF has a market cap of 984.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while KKPCF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas KKPCF's P/E ratio is 288.89. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KKPCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to KKPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check KKPCF's competition here
HKMPF vs GLASF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GLASF has a market cap of 943.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while GLASF trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas GLASF's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLASF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to GLASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check GLASF's competition here
HKMPF vs TWAPF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TWAPF has a market cap of 828.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while TWAPF trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TWAPF's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWAPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to TWAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check TWAPF's competition here
HKMPF vs CSWYF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CSWYF has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CSWYF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CSWYF's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSWYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to CSWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CSWYF's competition here
HKMPF vs TRXPF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TRXPF has a market cap of 690.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while TRXPF trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TRXPF's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRXPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to TRXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check TRXPF's competition here
HKMPF vs SHEZF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SHEZF has a market cap of 689M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SHEZF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SHEZF's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHEZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to SHEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SHEZF's competition here
HKMPF vs AGYTF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AGYTF has a market cap of 655.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while AGYTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas AGYTF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGYTF's ROE of +2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to AGYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check AGYTF's competition here
HKMPF vs YIHCF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YIHCF has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while YIHCF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas YIHCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YIHCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to YIHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check YIHCF's competition here
HKMPF vs AIHLF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AIHLF has a market cap of 624.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while AIHLF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas AIHLF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to AIHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check AIHLF's competition here
HKMPF vs TRSSF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TRSSF has a market cap of 601.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while TRSSF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas TRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRSSF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to TRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check TRSSF's competition here
HKMPF vs KHTRF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KHTRF has a market cap of 599M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while KHTRF trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas KHTRF's P/E ratio is 152.75. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KHTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to KHTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check KHTRF's competition here
HKMPF vs BOIRF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BOIRF has a market cap of 553.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while BOIRF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BOIRF's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOIRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to BOIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check BOIRF's competition here
HKMPF vs PKBFF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PKBFF has a market cap of 544.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while PKBFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas PKBFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PKBFF's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to PKBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check PKBFF's competition here
HKMPF vs CCHWF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCHWF has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CCHWF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CCHWF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCHWF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to CCHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CCHWF's competition here
HKMPF vs SWDCF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SWDCF has a market cap of 487.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SWDCF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SWDCF's P/E ratio is 101.67. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWDCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to SWDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SWDCF's competition here
HKMPF vs VRNOF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VRNOF has a market cap of 470.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while VRNOF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas VRNOF's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VRNOF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to VRNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check VRNOF's competition here
HKMPF vs PEXXF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEXXF has a market cap of 463.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while PEXXF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas PEXXF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEXXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to PEXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check PEXXF's competition here
HKMPF vs HUMDF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HUMDF has a market cap of 430.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while HUMDF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas HUMDF's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUMDF's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to HUMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check HUMDF's competition here
HKMPF vs ELTP Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ELTP has a market cap of 410.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while ELTP trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ELTP's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELTP's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to ELTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check ELTP's competition here
HKMPF vs CRLBF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRLBF has a market cap of 311.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CRLBF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CRLBF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRLBF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to CRLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CRLBF's competition here
HKMPF vs CPHRF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPHRF has a market cap of 302.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CPHRF trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CPHRF's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPHRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to CPHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CPHRF's competition here
HKMPF vs GUERF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GUERF has a market cap of 281M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while GUERF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas GUERF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GUERF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to GUERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check GUERF's competition here
HKMPF vs BHCCF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BHCCF has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while BHCCF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BHCCF's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHCCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to BHCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check BHCCF's competition here
HKMPF vs NIKA Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NIKA has a market cap of 211.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while NIKA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas NIKA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIKA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to NIKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check NIKA's competition here
HKMPF vs PLNHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLNHF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while PLNHF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas PLNHF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLNHF's ROE of +838111.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to PLNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check PLNHF's competition here
HKMPF vs CBWTF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CBWTF has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CBWTF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CBWTF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBWTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to CBWTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CBWTF's competition here
HKMPF vs COPHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COPHF has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while COPHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas COPHF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COPHF's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to COPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check COPHF's competition here
HKMPF vs NWPN Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NWPN has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while NWPN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas NWPN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWPN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to NWPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check NWPN's competition here
HKMPF vs LOVFF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LOVFF has a market cap of 118.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while LOVFF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas LOVFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to LOVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check LOVFF's competition here
HKMPF vs AAWH Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AAWH has a market cap of 113.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while AAWH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas AAWH's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAWH's ROE of +5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to AAWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check AAWH's competition here
HKMPF vs BIOYF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BIOYF has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while BIOYF trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas BIOYF's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIOYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to BIOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check BIOYF's competition here
HKMPF vs LPCUF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LPCUF has a market cap of 112.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while LPCUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas LPCUF's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LPCUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to LPCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check LPCUF's competition here
HKMPF vs CNVCF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CNVCF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while CNVCF trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas CNVCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNVCF's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to CNVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check CNVCF's competition here
HKMPF vs GRUSF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRUSF has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while GRUSF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas GRUSF's P/E ratio is 43.42. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRUSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to GRUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check GRUSF's competition here
HKMPF vs JUSHF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JUSHF has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while JUSHF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas JUSHF's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JUSHF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to JUSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check JUSHF's competition here
HKMPF vs HLTRF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HLTRF has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while HLTRF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas HLTRF's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLTRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to HLTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check HLTRF's competition here
HKMPF vs MEDXF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MEDXF has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while MEDXF trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas MEDXF's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEDXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to MEDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check MEDXF's competition here
HKMPF vs SHIEF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SHIEF has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while SHIEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas SHIEF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHIEF's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to SHIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check SHIEF's competition here
HKMPF vs ABSCF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ABSCF has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while ABSCF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ABSCF's P/E ratio is -37.33. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABSCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to ABSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check ABSCF's competition here
HKMPF vs ORXOF Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ORXOF has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while ORXOF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas ORXOF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORXOF's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is less volatile compared to ORXOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check ORXOF's competition here
HKMPF vs EOFBY Comparison June 2026
HKMPF plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKMPF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EOFBY has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKMPF is priced at $19.29, while EOFBY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKMPF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.66, whereas EOFBY's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, HKMPF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EOFBY's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HKMPF is more volatile compared to EOFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKMPF.Check EOFBY's competition here