BingEx Limited (FLX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLX | $2.28 | -0.44% | 52.1M | 14.25 | $0.16 | N/A |
| UPS | $108.54 | -1.52% | 92.3B | 17.56 | $6.18 | +6.02% |
| FDX | $331.00 | +0.91% | 79B | 17.68 | $18.72 | +1.41% |
| JBHT | $284.95 | +0.58% | 26.9B | 44.18 | $6.45 | +0.62% |
| XPO | $218.94 | -0.15% | 25.7B | 74.96 | $2.92 | N/A |
| CHRW | $184.09 | -0.27% | 21.7B | 37.34 | $4.93 | +1.36% |
| EXPD | $160.44 | +0.19% | 21B | 25.87 | $6.20 | +0.98% |
| ZTO | $22.28 | -1.02% | 17.7B | 13.20 | $1.69 | +3.10% |
| LSTR | $218.06 | -0.68% | 7.4B | 60.40 | $3.61 | +1.66% |
| GXO | $48.68 | -1.99% | 5.6B | 43.45 | $1.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLX vs UPS Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while UPS trades at $108.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check UPS's competition here
FLX vs FDX Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while FDX trades at $331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FDX's competition here
FLX vs JBHT Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while JBHT trades at $284.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JBHT's competition here
FLX vs XPO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while XPO trades at $218.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 74.96. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check XPO's competition here
FLX vs CHRW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while CHRW trades at $184.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 37.34. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CHRW's competition here
FLX vs EXPD Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while EXPD trades at $160.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check EXPD's competition here
FLX vs ZTO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while ZTO trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ZTO's competition here
FLX vs LSTR Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while LSTR trades at $218.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 60.40. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSTR's competition here
FLX vs GXO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while GXO trades at $48.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GXO's competition here
FLX vs HUBG Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while HUBG trades at $42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check HUBG's competition here
FLX vs PBI Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while PBI trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PBI's competition here
FLX vs CYRX Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 791.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while CYRX trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CYRX's competition here
FLX vs RLGT Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while RLGT trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check RLGT's competition here
FLX vs FWRD Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while FWRD trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check FWRD's competition here
FLX vs PAL Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 177.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while PAL trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PAL's competition here
FLX vs SINO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SINO's competition here
FLX vs CRGO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 84.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while CRGO trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGO's competition here
FLX vs SFWL Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while SFWL trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SFWL's competition here
FLX vs AIRTP Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while AIRTP trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 57.89. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTP's competition here
FLX vs AIRT Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while AIRT trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRT's competition here
FLX vs NCEW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while NCEW trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check NCEW's competition here
FLX vs PSIG Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while PSIG trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check PSIG's competition here
FLX vs BTOC Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while BTOC trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check BTOC's competition here
FLX vs ELOG Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while ELOG trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ELOG's competition here
FLX vs LSH Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while LSH trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check LSH's competition here
FLX vs GVH Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while GVH trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check GVH's competition here
FLX vs CRGOW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while CRGOW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CRGOW's competition here
FLX vs CJMB Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while CJMB trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check CJMB's competition here
FLX vs ATXG Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while ATXG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ATXG's competition here
FLX vs JYD Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while JYD trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check JYD's competition here
FLX vs SGLY Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while SGLY trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check SGLY's competition here
FLX vs UTIW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check UTIW's competition here
FLX vs AIRTW Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check AIRTW's competition here
FLX vs ECHO Comparison June 2026
FLX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLX stands at 52.1M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLX is priced at $2.28, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.25, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLX is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLX.Check ECHO's competition here