Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLO | $7.48 | +2.47% | 1.6B | 21.37 | $0.35 | +13.16% |
| JBS | $12.24 | +0.25% | 27.1B | 7.55 | $1.62 | +8.24% |
| KHC | $22.58 | +0.49% | 26.8B | -4.65 | -$4.86 | +7.08% |
| GIS | $33.15 | +2.95% | 17.7B | 8.10 | $4.09 | +7.32% |
| HRL | $23.62 | +1.42% | 13B | 27.79 | $0.85 | +4.94% |
| MKC-V | $47.89 | +2.64% | 12.9B | 7.85 | $6.10 | +3.95% |
| MKC | $47.24 | +1.33% | 12.7B | 7.75 | $6.10 | +3.91% |
| SJM | $103.54 | +2.39% | 11B | -8.78 | -$11.79 | +4.24% |
| MICC | $17.07 | +0.23% | 10.5B | 30.48 | $0.56 | N/A |
| DAR | $59.45 | -2.09% | 9.4B | 43.05 | $1.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLO vs JBS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while JBS trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to JBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JBS's competition here
FLO vs KHC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while KHC trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check KHC's competition here
FLO vs GIS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while GIS trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check GIS's competition here
FLO vs HRL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while HRL trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HRL's competition here
FLO vs MKC-V Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while MKC-V trades at $47.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MKC-V's competition here
FLO vs MKC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while MKC trades at $47.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MKC's competition here
FLO vs SJM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SJM trades at $103.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SJM's competition here
FLO vs MICC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while MICC trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MICC's competition here
FLO vs DAR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while DAR trades at $59.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 43.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check DAR's competition here
FLO vs PPC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while PPC trades at $29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PPC's competition here
FLO vs CPB Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while CPB trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CPB's competition here
FLO vs INGR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while INGR trades at $99.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check INGR's competition here
FLO vs CAG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while CAG trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is -129.90. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CAG's competition here
FLO vs LW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while LW trades at $42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LW's competition here
FLO vs BRFS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BRFS trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRFS's competition here
FLO vs LANC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LANC's competition here
FLO vs TWNK Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check TWNK's competition here
FLO vs TWNKW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check TWNKW's competition here
FLO vs POST Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while POST trades at $90.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check POST's competition here
FLO vs MZTI Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while MZTI trades at $107.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MZTI's competition here
FLO vs CENT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while CENT trades at $40.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CENT's competition here
FLO vs FRPT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while FRPT trades at $49.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FRPT's competition here
FLO vs SOVO Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SOVO's competition here
FLO vs CENTA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while CENTA trades at $35.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CENTA's competition here
FLO vs KLG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while KLG trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check KLG's competition here
FLO vs JJSF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while JJSF trades at $75.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JJSF's competition here
FLO vs NOMD Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while NOMD trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NOMD's competition here
FLO vs THS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while THS trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check THS's competition here
FLO vs HLF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while HLF trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HLF's competition here
FLO vs SMPL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SMPL trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMPL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SMPL's competition here
FLO vs BRBR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BRBR trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRBR's competition here
FLO vs SENEA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SENEA trades at $146.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SENEA's competition here
FLO vs SENEB Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SENEB trades at $146.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SENEB's competition here
FLO vs JBSS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 881.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while JBSS trades at $75.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JBSS's competition here
FLO vs STKL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while STKL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check STKL's competition here
FLO vs WEST Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 735.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while WEST trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check WEST's competition here
FLO vs UTZ Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 626.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while UTZ trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is -70.75. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UTZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check UTZ's competition here
FLO vs MAMA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 616.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while MAMA trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 116.54. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MAMA's competition here
FLO vs THRN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check THRN's competition here
FLO vs BRCC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 413.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BRCC trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -14.44. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRCC's competition here
FLO vs BYND Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 365.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BYND trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYND's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BYND's competition here
FLO vs LWAY Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 360.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while LWAY trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LWAY's competition here
FLO vs NATR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 348M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while NATR trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NATR's competition here
FLO vs USNA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while USNA trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 36.02. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check USNA's competition here
FLO vs BGS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BGS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BGS's competition here
FLO vs FREE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FREE's competition here
FLO vs WESTW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check WESTW's competition here
FLO vs MMMB Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MMMB's competition here
FLO vs LFVN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while LFVN trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LFVN's competition here
FLO vs PLIN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PLIN's competition here
FLO vs OFRM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while OFRM trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -46.36. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OFRM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check OFRM's competition here
FLO vs FTLF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 92.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while FTLF trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FTLF's competition here
FLO vs HAIN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while HAIN trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HAIN's competition here
FLO vs BRID Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BRID trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRID's competition here
FLO vs BOF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BOF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BOF's competition here
FLO vs MITC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MITC's competition here
FLO vs WYHG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while WYHG trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check WYHG's competition here
FLO vs LSF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while LSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LSF's competition here
FLO vs BRLS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BRLS trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRLS's competition here
FLO vs CLXT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CLXT's competition here
FLO vs HAPP Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HAPP's competition here
FLO vs FARM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while FARM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FARM's competition here
FLO vs DDC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while DDC trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDC's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check DDC's competition here
FLO vs JVA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while JVA trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JVA's competition here
FLO vs YGF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check YGF's competition here
FLO vs ABVEW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while ABVEW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ABVEW's competition here
FLO vs ORIS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while ORIS trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ORIS's competition here
FLO vs COOT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while COOT trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check COOT's competition here
FLO vs NAII Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while NAII trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NAII's competition here
FLO vs MWYN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while MWYN trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MWYN's competition here
FLO vs TTCF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check TTCF's competition here
FLO vs PLAG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while PLAG trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -18.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PLAG's competition here
FLO vs PETZ Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while PETZ trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PETZ's competition here
FLO vs BON Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BON trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BON's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BON's competition here
FLO vs NUZE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NUZE's competition here
FLO vs BTTR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BTTR's competition here
FLO vs HCWC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while HCWC trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HCWC's competition here
FLO vs ABVE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while ABVE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ABVE's competition here
FLO vs CYAN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while CYAN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CYAN's competition here
FLO vs ATPC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while ATPC trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ATPC's competition here
FLO vs FREEW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FREEW's competition here
FLO vs NCRA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while NCRA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NCRA's competition here
FLO vs RGF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check RGF's competition here
FLO vs IMG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while IMG trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check IMG's competition here
FLO vs FAMI Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while FAMI trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FAMI's competition here
FLO vs SOWG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SOWG trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SOWG's competition here
FLO vs BRLSW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BRLSW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRLSW's competition here
FLO vs STKH Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 98.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while STKH trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check STKH's competition here
FLO vs PAVS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 47.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while PAVS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PAVS's competition here
FLO vs SNAXW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SNAXW's competition here
FLO vs BSFC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 12.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BSFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSFC's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BSFC's competition here
FLO vs SMFL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SMFL's competition here
FLO vs SNAX Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNAX's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SNAX's competition here
FLO vs RIBT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIBT's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check RIBT's competition here
FLO vs LNCE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LNCE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while LNCE trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LNCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNCE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LNCE's competition here
FLO vs VGFC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check VGFC's competition here
FLO vs SAFM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SAFM's competition here
FLO vs BRCN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRCN's competition here
FLO vs DTEA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.48, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check DTEA's competition here