Fluent, Inc. (FLNT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLNT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLNT | $2.22 | -7.11% | 43.4M | -2.67 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| OMC | $75.31 | -0.42% | 21.5B | -203.51 | -$0.37 | +3.99% |
| TTD | $19.95 | -5.14% | 9.4B | 22.67 | $0.88 | N/A |
| IPG | $24.57 | -1.96% | 8.9B | 16.83 | $1.46 | +1.34% |
| QMMM | $119.40 | +0.00% | 5.8B | -702.35 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| WPP | $17.70 | -2.06% | 3.8B | -13.22 | -$1.34 | +5.76% |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| CMPR | $94.55 | -2.50% | 2.3B | 51.67 | $1.83 | N/A |
| MGNI | $14.68 | -1.21% | 2.1B | 13.98 | $1.05 | N/A |
| IAS | $10.34 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 36.93 | $0.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLNT vs OMC Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while OMC trades at $75.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is -203.51. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check OMC's competition here
FLNT vs TTD Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while TTD trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TTD's competition here
FLNT vs IPG Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while IPG trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check IPG's competition here
FLNT vs QMMM Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while QMMM trades at $119.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -702.35. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check QMMM's competition here
FLNT vs WPP Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while WPP trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to WPP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check WPP's competition here
FLNT vs MDCA Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MDCA's competition here
FLNT vs CMPR Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while CMPR trades at $94.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 51.67. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CMPR's competition here
FLNT vs MGNI Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MGNI trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MGNI's competition here
FLNT vs IAS Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while IAS trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check IAS's competition here
FLNT vs ZD Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ZD trades at $45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ZD's competition here
FLNT vs STGW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while STGW trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check STGW's competition here
FLNT vs CCO Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while CCO trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CCO's competition here
FLNT vs DLX Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while DLX trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DLX's competition here
FLNT vs EEX Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 986.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while EEX trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is -26.24. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to EEX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check EEX's competition here
FLNT vs CRTO Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 890.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while CRTO trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CRTO's competition here
FLNT vs BOMN Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to BOMN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check BOMN's competition here
FLNT vs MNTN Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MNTN has a market cap of 691.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MNTN trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MNTN's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MNTN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MNTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MNTN's competition here
FLNT vs QNST Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 686.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while QNST trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to QNST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check QNST's competition here
FLNT vs ADV Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 515.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ADV trades at $38.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ADV's competition here
FLNT vs NEXN Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 475.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while NEXN trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check NEXN's competition here
FLNT vs CTV-WT Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CTV-WT has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while CTV-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas CTV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CTV-WT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CTV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CTV-WT's competition here
FLNT vs CTV Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CTV's competition here
FLNT vs BOC Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 417.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while BOC trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is -30.49. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to BOC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check BOC's competition here
FLNT vs QUOT Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check QUOT's competition here
FLNT vs NCMI Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while NCMI trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check NCMI's competition here
FLNT vs ADTH Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ADTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ADTH's competition here
FLNT vs TRMR Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 182.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TRMR's competition here
FLNT vs TSQ Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 107.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while TSQ trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TSQ's competition here
FLNT vs TZOO Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while TZOO trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TZOO's competition here
FLNT vs ATY Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ATY's competition here
FLNT vs ICLK Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ICLK's competition here
FLNT vs MNTN-WT Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MNTN-WT has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MNTN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MNTN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MNTN-WT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to MNTN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MNTN-WT's competition here
FLNT vs STCN Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check STCN's competition here
FLNT vs WIMI Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while WIMI trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to WIMI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check WIMI's competition here
FLNT vs MCHX Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MCHX trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MCHX's competition here
FLNT vs CHR Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while CHR trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CHR's competition here
FLNT vs XNET Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while XNET trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check XNET's competition here
FLNT vs ABLV Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ABLV trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ABLV's competition here
FLNT vs SDM Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while SDM trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to SDM's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check SDM's competition here
FLNT vs ADTHW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ADTHW's competition here
FLNT vs TZUP Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TZUP has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while TZUP trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas TZUP's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TZUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to TZUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TZUP's competition here
FLNT vs GSMG Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check GSMG's competition here
FLNT vs SWAG Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while SWAG trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is 101.50. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to SWAG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check SWAG's competition here
FLNT vs MOXC Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MOXC's competition here
FLNT vs TJGC Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TJGC has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while TJGC trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas TJGC's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TJGC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to TJGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TJGC's competition here
FLNT vs CDLX Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while CDLX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -8.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CDLX's competition here
FLNT vs ACCS Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ACCS trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -16.71. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ACCS's competition here
FLNT vs INUV Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while INUV trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check INUV's competition here
FLNT vs HHS Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while HHS trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to HHS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check HHS's competition here
FLNT vs MOBQ Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MOBQ trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -7.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MOBQ's competition here
FLNT vs MCTR Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MCTR trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MCTR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MCTR's competition here
FLNT vs ISIG Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ISIG's competition here
FLNT vs FTRK Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, FTRK has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while FTRK trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas FTRK's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to FTRK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to FTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check FTRK's competition here
FLNT vs DMS Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DMS's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DMS's competition here
FLNT vs LDWY Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while LDWY trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check LDWY's competition here
FLNT vs EDHL Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while EDHL trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to EDHL's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check EDHL's competition here
FLNT vs DRCTW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DRCTW's competition here
FLNT vs YDKG Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, YDKG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while YDKG trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas YDKG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to YDKG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to YDKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check YDKG's competition here
FLNT vs BAOS Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while BAOS trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check BAOS's competition here
FLNT vs STFS Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while STFS trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to STFS's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check STFS's competition here
FLNT vs MGOL Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -21.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MGOL's competition here
FLNT vs KUST Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, KUST has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while KUST trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas KUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to KUST's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to KUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check KUST's competition here
FLNT vs STRNW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to STRNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check STRNW's competition here
FLNT vs VSME Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while VSME trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check VSME's competition here
FLNT vs CNET Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while CNET trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CNET's competition here
FLNT vs ADVWW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ADVWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ADVWW's competition here
FLNT vs ABLVW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 906K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ABLVW's competition here
FLNT vs TRKAW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TRKAW's competition here
FLNT vs DRCT Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 416.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while DRCT trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DRCT's competition here
FLNT vs SWAGW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 408.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while SWAGW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check SWAGW's competition here
FLNT vs SRAX Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 326.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while SRAX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check SRAX's competition here
FLNT vs HAO Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 51.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while HAO trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to HAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check HAO's competition here
FLNT vs MOBQW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 44.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -7.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MOBQW's competition here
FLNT vs GSMGW Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check GSMGW's competition here
FLNT vs SZMK Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, SZMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while SZMK trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas SZMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to SZMK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to SZMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check SZMK's competition here
FLNT vs TRKA Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TRKA's competition here
FLNT vs DMS-WT Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DMS-WT's competition here
FLNT vs ZDVSV Comparison June 2026
FLNT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 43.4M. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $2.22, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.67, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ZDVSV's competition here