Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLGT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Diagnostics & Research Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLGT | $19.15 | +5.57% | 553.8M | -8.12 | -$2.40 | N/A |
| DHR-PB | $1,261.26 | -0.78% | 916.8B | 146.01 | $8.64 | +0.73% |
| TMO | $474.63 | +0.14% | 179.1B | 26.53 | $18.17 | +0.37% |
| DHR | $185.01 | +3.89% | 132B | 36.15 | $5.16 | +0.73% |
| IDXX | $562.33 | +0.29% | 44.5B | 41.49 | $13.61 | N/A |
| A | $136.29 | -0.81% | 39.1B | 27.84 | $4.97 | +0.54% |
| NTRA | $219.12 | +3.43% | 31.8B | -137.10 | -$1.62 | N/A |
| IQV | $185.82 | +2.07% | 31.2B | 23.19 | $8.06 | N/A |
| ILMN | $163.03 | -4.62% | 25.4B | 30.50 | $5.51 | N/A |
| WAT | $369.70 | -2.65% | 24.5B | 47.83 | $7.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLGT vs DHR-PB Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, DHR-PB has a market cap of 916.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while DHR-PB trades at $1,261.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas DHR-PB's P/E ratio is 146.01. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DHR-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to DHR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check DHR-PB's competition here
FLGT vs TMO Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, TMO has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while TMO trades at $474.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas TMO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to TMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check TMO's competition here
FLGT vs DHR Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, DHR has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while DHR trades at $185.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas DHR's P/E ratio is 36.15. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to DHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check DHR's competition here
FLGT vs IDXX Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, IDXX has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while IDXX trades at $562.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas IDXX's P/E ratio is 41.49. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IDXX's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to IDXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check IDXX's competition here
FLGT vs A Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, A has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while A trades at $136.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas A's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to A's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check A's competition here
FLGT vs NTRA Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, NTRA has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while NTRA trades at $219.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas NTRA's P/E ratio is -137.10. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTRA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to NTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check NTRA's competition here
FLGT vs IQV Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, IQV has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while IQV trades at $185.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas IQV's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IQV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to IQV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check IQV's competition here
FLGT vs ILMN Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, ILMN has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while ILMN trades at $163.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas ILMN's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ILMN's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to ILMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check ILMN's competition here
FLGT vs WAT Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, WAT has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while WAT trades at $369.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas WAT's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WAT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to WAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check WAT's competition here
FLGT vs MTD Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, MTD has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while MTD trades at $1,153.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas MTD's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MTD's ROE of -6.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to MTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check MTD's competition here
FLGT vs DGX Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, DGX has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while DGX trades at $199.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas DGX's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DGX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to DGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check DGX's competition here
FLGT vs LH Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, LH has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while LH trades at $265.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas LH's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to LH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check LH's competition here
FLGT vs EXAS Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, EXAS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while EXAS trades at $104.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas EXAS's P/E ratio is -95.37. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXAS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to EXAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check EXAS's competition here
FLGT vs GH Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, GH has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while GH trades at $129.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas GH's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GH's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to GH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check GH's competition here
FLGT vs PKI Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, PKI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while PKI trades at $115.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas PKI's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PKI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to PKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check PKI's competition here
FLGT vs MEDP Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, MEDP has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while MEDP trades at $455.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas MEDP's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MEDP's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to MEDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check MEDP's competition here
FLGT vs ICLR Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, ICLR has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while ICLR trades at $150.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas ICLR's P/E ratio is 52.69. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ICLR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to ICLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check ICLR's competition here
FLGT vs RVTY Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, RVTY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while RVTY trades at $98.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas RVTY's P/E ratio is 49.23. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RVTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to RVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check RVTY's competition here
FLGT vs CRL Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, CRL has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while CRL trades at $184.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas CRL's P/E ratio is -50.09. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to CRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check CRL's competition here
FLGT vs QGEN Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, QGEN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while QGEN trades at $36.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas QGEN's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QGEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to QGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check QGEN's competition here
FLGT vs BLLN Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, BLLN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while BLLN trades at $101.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas BLLN's P/E ratio is 193.69. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLLN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to BLLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check BLLN's competition here
FLGT vs TWST Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, TWST has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while TWST trades at $71.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas TWST's P/E ratio is -56.01. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TWST's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to TWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check TWST's competition here
FLGT vs SYNH Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, SYNH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while SYNH trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas SYNH's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYNH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to SYNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check SYNH's competition here
FLGT vs SHC Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, SHC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while SHC trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas SHC's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SHC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to SHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check SHC's competition here
FLGT vs RDNT Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, RDNT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while RDNT trades at $53.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas RDNT's P/E ratio is -310.65. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RDNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to RDNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check RDNT's competition here
FLGT vs OLK Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, OLK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while OLK trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas OLK's P/E ratio is -96.59. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OLK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to OLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check OLK's competition here
FLGT vs GRAL Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, GRAL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while GRAL trades at $61.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas GRAL's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRAL's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to GRAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check GRAL's competition here
FLGT vs NEOG Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, NEOG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while NEOG trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas NEOG's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NEOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to NEOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check NEOG's competition here
FLGT vs CDNA Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, CDNA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while CDNA trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas CDNA's P/E ratio is -144.50. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to CDNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check CDNA's competition here
FLGT vs PSNL Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, PSNL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while PSNL trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas PSNL's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PSNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to PSNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check PSNL's competition here
FLGT vs CSTL Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, CSTL has a market cap of 655.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while CSTL trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas CSTL's P/E ratio is -51.43. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CSTL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to CSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check CSTL's competition here
FLGT vs GRALV Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, GRALV has a market cap of 579.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while GRALV trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas GRALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRALV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to GRALV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check GRALV's competition here
FLGT vs MYGN Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, MYGN has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while MYGN trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas MYGN's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MYGN's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to MYGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check MYGN's competition here
FLGT vs CO Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, CO has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while CO trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas CO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to CO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check CO's competition here
FLGT vs PRE Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, PRE has a market cap of 353.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while PRE trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas PRE's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to PRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check PRE's competition here
FLGT vs NEO Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, NEO has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while NEO trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas NEO's P/E ratio is -14.69. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NEO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to NEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check NEO's competition here
FLGT vs FLDM Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, FLDM has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while FLDM trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas FLDM's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FLDM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to FLDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check FLDM's competition here
FLGT vs OPGN Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, OPGN has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while OPGN trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas OPGN's P/E ratio is 132.83. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OPGN's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to OPGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check OPGN's competition here
FLGT vs IMDX Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, IMDX has a market cap of 177.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while IMDX trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas IMDX's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IMDX's ROE of +3.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to IMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check IMDX's competition here
FLGT vs BDSX Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, BDSX has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while BDSX trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas BDSX's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BDSX's ROE of -21.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to BDSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check BDSX's competition here
FLGT vs GTH Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, GTH has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while GTH trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas GTH's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GTH's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to GTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check GTH's competition here
FLGT vs XGN Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, XGN has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while XGN trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas XGN's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XGN's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to XGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check XGN's competition here
FLGT vs GENE Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, GENE has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while GENE trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas GENE's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GENE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to GENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check GENE's competition here
FLGT vs ATLN Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, ATLN has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while ATLN trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas ATLN's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ATLN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to ATLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check ATLN's competition here
FLGT vs STIM Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, STIM has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while STIM trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas STIM's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STIM's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to STIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check STIM's competition here
FLGT vs SERA Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, SERA has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while SERA trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas SERA's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SERA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to SERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check SERA's competition here
FLGT vs DRIO Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, DRIO has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while DRIO trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas DRIO's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DRIO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to DRIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check DRIO's competition here
FLGT vs PRPO Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, PRPO has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while PRPO trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas PRPO's P/E ratio is -53.16. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to PRPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check PRPO's competition here
FLGT vs STRR Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while STRR trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to STRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check STRR's competition here
FLGT vs STRRP Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, STRRP has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while STRRP trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas STRRP's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STRRP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to STRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check STRRP's competition here
FLGT vs MDXH Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, MDXH has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while MDXH trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas MDXH's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MDXH's ROE of +4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to MDXH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check MDXH's competition here
FLGT vs QUCY Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, QUCY has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while QUCY trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas QUCY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QUCY's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to QUCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check QUCY's competition here
FLGT vs AKU Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, AKU has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while AKU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas AKU's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AKU's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to AKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check AKU's competition here
FLGT vs CEMI Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, CEMI has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while CEMI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas CEMI's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CEMI's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to CEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check CEMI's competition here
FLGT vs ENZ Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, ENZ has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while ENZ trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas ENZ's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ENZ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to ENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check ENZ's competition here
FLGT vs PMD Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, PMD has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while PMD trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas PMD's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PMD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to PMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check PMD's competition here
FLGT vs ME Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, ME has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while ME trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas ME's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ME's ROE of -7.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to ME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check ME's competition here
FLGT vs MYNZ Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, MYNZ has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while MYNZ trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas MYNZ's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MYNZ's ROE of -10.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to MYNZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check MYNZ's competition here
FLGT vs VNRX Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, VNRX has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while VNRX trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas VNRX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VNRX's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to VNRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check VNRX's competition here
FLGT vs CHEK Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, CHEK has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while CHEK trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas CHEK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CHEK's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to CHEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check CHEK's competition here
FLGT vs BNR Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, BNR has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while BNR trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas BNR's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BNR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to BNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check BNR's competition here
FLGT vs CNTG Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, CNTG has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while CNTG trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas CNTG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CNTG's ROE of +3.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to CNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check CNTG's competition here
FLGT vs MBAI Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, MBAI has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while MBAI trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas MBAI's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MBAI's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to MBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check MBAI's competition here
FLGT vs BIAF Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, BIAF has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while BIAF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas BIAF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BIAF's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to BIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check BIAF's competition here
FLGT vs APDN Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, APDN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while APDN trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas APDN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to APDN's ROE of -6.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to APDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check APDN's competition here
FLGT vs TRIB Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, TRIB has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while TRIB trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas TRIB's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRIB's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to TRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check TRIB's competition here
FLGT vs NVTA Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, NVTA has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while NVTA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas NVTA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NVTA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to NVTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check NVTA's competition here
FLGT vs LMDX Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, LMDX has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while LMDX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas LMDX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LMDX's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to LMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check LMDX's competition here
FLGT vs LMDXW Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, LMDXW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while LMDXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas LMDXW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LMDXW's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to LMDXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check LMDXW's competition here
FLGT vs ADVB Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, ADVB has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while ADVB trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas ADVB's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADVB's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to ADVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check ADVB's competition here
FLGT vs BGLC Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, BGLC has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while BGLC trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas BGLC's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BGLC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to BGLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check BGLC's competition here
FLGT vs BNGO Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, BNGO has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while BNGO trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas BNGO's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BNGO's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to BNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check BNGO's competition here
FLGT vs NDRA Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, NDRA has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while NDRA trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas NDRA's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NDRA's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to NDRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check NDRA's competition here
FLGT vs DMTK Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, DMTK has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while DMTK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas DMTK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DMTK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to DMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check DMTK's competition here
FLGT vs NOTV Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, NOTV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while NOTV trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas NOTV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NOTV's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to NOTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check NOTV's competition here
FLGT vs SQL Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, SQL has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while SQL trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas SQL's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SQL's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to SQL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check SQL's competition here
FLGT vs AWH Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, AWH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while AWH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas AWH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AWH's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to AWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check AWH's competition here
FLGT vs INBS Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, INBS has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while INBS trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas INBS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INBS's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to INBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check INBS's competition here
FLGT vs HTGM Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, HTGM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while HTGM trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas HTGM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HTGM's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to HTGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check HTGM's competition here
FLGT vs BIAFW Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, BIAFW has a market cap of 899.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while BIAFW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas BIAFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BIAFW's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to BIAFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check BIAFW's competition here
FLGT vs BIOC Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, BIOC has a market cap of 450.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while BIOC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas BIOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BIOC's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to BIOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check BIOC's competition here
FLGT vs ISPC Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, ISPC has a market cap of 441.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while ISPC trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas ISPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ISPC's ROE of -5.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to ISPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check ISPC's competition here
FLGT vs PRENW Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, PRENW has a market cap of 224.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while PRENW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas PRENW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRENW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to PRENW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check PRENW's competition here
FLGT vs SQLLW Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, SQLLW has a market cap of 164.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while SQLLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas SQLLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SQLLW's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to SQLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check SQLLW's competition here
FLGT vs TTOO Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, TTOO has a market cap of 56.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while TTOO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas TTOO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TTOO's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to TTOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check TTOO's competition here
FLGT vs BNGOW Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, BNGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while BNGOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas BNGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BNGOW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to BNGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check BNGOW's competition here
FLGT vs MEUSW Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, MEUSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while MEUSW trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas MEUSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MEUSW's ROE of -7.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to MEUSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check MEUSW's competition here
FLGT vs PRXL Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, PRXL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while PRXL trades at $88.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas PRXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRXL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to PRXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check PRXL's competition here
FLGT vs OCDX Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, OCDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while OCDX trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas OCDX's P/E ratio is -42.28. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OCDX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to OCDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check OCDX's competition here
FLGT vs DHR-PA Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, DHR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while DHR-PA trades at $1,841.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas DHR-PA's P/E ratio is 233.57. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DHR-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is more volatile compared to DHR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check DHR-PA's competition here
FLGT vs CHEKZ Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, CHEKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while CHEKZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas CHEKZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CHEKZ's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to CHEKZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check CHEKZ's competition here
FLGT vs NDRAW Comparison June 2026
FLGT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLGT stands at 553.8M. In comparison, NDRAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLGT is priced at $19.15, while NDRAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLGT currently has a P/E ratio of -8.12, whereas NDRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLGT's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NDRAW's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLGT is less volatile compared to NDRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLGT.Check NDRAW's competition here