FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SPGI has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while SPGI trades at $412.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas SPGI's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SPGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to SPGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check SPGI's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CME has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while CME trades at $252.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CME's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CME's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to CME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check CME's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MCO has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while MCO trades at $448.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MCO's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MCO's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to MCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check MCO's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ICE has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while ICE trades at $138.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas ICE's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to ICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check ICE's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NDAQ has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while NDAQ trades at $86.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas NDAQ's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NDAQ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to NDAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check NDAQ's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MSCI has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while MSCI trades at $613.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MSCI's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MSCI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to MSCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check MSCI's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, COIN has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while COIN trades at $163.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas COIN's P/E ratio is 60.23. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COIN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to COIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check COIN's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CBOE has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while CBOE trades at $285.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas CBOE's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CBOE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is less volatile compared to CBOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check CBOE's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MORN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while MORN trades at $180.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas MORN's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MORN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is less volatile compared to MORN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check MORN's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, DNB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while DNB trades at $9.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas DNB's P/E ratio is -101.67. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DNB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to DNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check DNB's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VALU has a market cap of 300.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while VALU trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas VALU's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VALU's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is more volatile compared to VALU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check VALU's competition here

FDS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FDS stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FDS is priced at $253.44, while BTOG trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FDS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.32, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FDS's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FDS is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FDS.Check BTOG's competition here