Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See ET's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for ET and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | $19.93 | -1.31% | 69.1B | 13.67 | $1.47 | +6.68% |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +6.68% |
| ENB | $46.52 | -0.47% | 102.5B | 21.94 | $2.14 | +5.93% |
| WMB | $68.45 | -1.17% | 84.4B | 30.39 | $2.27 | +3.01% |
| EPD | $36.28 | -1.29% | 79.4B | 12.75 | $2.88 | +6.00% |
| ET-PI | $11.14 | -1.63% | 69.6B | 7.57 | $1.48 | +6.68% |
| KMI | $30.34 | -1.35% | 68.2B | 20.03 | $1.53 | +3.85% |
| TRP | $58.06 | -1.22% | 61.1B | 22.84 | $2.57 | +4.22% |
| TRGP | $274.26 | -1.29% | 59.5B | 26.52 | $10.46 | +1.62% |
| MPLX | $56.85 | +0.09% | 58.5B | 12.40 | $4.65 | +7.47% |
Stock Comparison
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PE)
ET vs ET-PE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ET-PE's competition here
Enbridge Inc. (NYSE: ENB)
ET vs ENB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 102.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ENB trades at $46.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ENB's competition here
The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE: WMB)
ET vs WMB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while WMB trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check WMB's competition here
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE: EPD)
ET vs EPD Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while EPD trades at $36.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EPD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check EPD's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PI)
ET vs ET-PI Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ET-PI trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ET-PI's competition here
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE: KMI)
ET vs KMI Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while KMI trades at $30.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check KMI's competition here
TC Energy Corporation (NYSE: TRP)
ET vs TRP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TRP trades at $58.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TRP's competition here
Targa Resources Corp. (NYSE: TRGP)
ET vs TRGP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TRGP trades at $274.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TRGP's competition here
MPLX Lp (NYSE: MPLX)
ET vs MPLX Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while MPLX trades at $56.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MPLX's competition here
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (NYSE: LNG)
ET vs LNG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while LNG trades at $268.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check LNG's competition here
ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE)
ET vs OKE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while OKE trades at $87.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check OKE's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PC)
ET vs ET-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ET-PC's competition here
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET-PD)
ET vs ET-PD Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ET-PD's competition here
Enbridge Inc. 6.375 SNT18 B 78 (NYSE: ENBA)
ET vs ENBA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ENBA's competition here
MPLX Lp (NYSE: MPLXP)
ET vs MPLXP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, MPLXP has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while MPLXP trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MPLXP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPLXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to MPLXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MPLXP's competition here
Venture Global, Inc. (NYSE: VG)
ET vs VG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while VG trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check VG's competition here
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: CQP)
ET vs CQP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while CQP trades at $60.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CQP's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check CQP's competition here
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (NYSE: PBA)
ET vs PBA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while PBA trades at $44.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PBA's competition here
TransCanada PipeLines Limited 6 (NYSE: TCPA)
ET vs TCPA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TCPA has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TCPA trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCPA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TCPA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TCPA's competition here
Western Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: WES)
ET vs WES Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while WES trades at $44.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check WES's competition here
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (NASDAQ: PAA)
ET vs PAA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while PAA trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PAA's competition here
Viper Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: VNOM)
ET vs VNOM Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while VNOM trades at $40.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check VNOM's competition here
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MMP)
ET vs MMP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MMP's competition here
DT Midstream, Inc. (NYSE: DTM)
ET vs DTM Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while DTM trades at $121.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DTM's competition here
Antero Midstream Corporation (NYSE: AM)
ET vs AM Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while AM trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check AM's competition here
DCP Midstream, LP (NYSE: DCP)
ET vs DCP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DCP's competition here
Hess Midstream LP (NYSE: HESM)
ET vs HESM Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while HESM trades at $38.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HESM's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check HESM's competition here
South Bow Corporation (NYSE: SOBO)
ET vs SOBO Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SOBO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while SOBO trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SOBO's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOBO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SOBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SOBO's competition here
DCP Midstream, LP (NYSE: DCP-PC)
ET vs DCP-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DCP-PC's competition here
EnLink Midstream, LLC (NYSE: ENLC)
ET vs ENLC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ENLC's competition here
Equitrans Midstream Corporation (NYSE: ETRN)
ET vs ETRN Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ETRN's competition here
Plains GP Holdings LP (NASDAQ: PAGP)
ET vs PAGP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while PAGP trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PAGP's competition here
Golar LNG Limited (NASDAQ: GLNG)
ET vs GLNG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GLNG trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLNG's competition here
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (NYSE: TGS)
ET vs TGS Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TGS trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TGS's competition here
Excelerate Energy, Inc. (NYSE: EE)
ET vs EE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while EE trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check EE's competition here
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (NYSE: KNTK)
ET vs KNTK Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while KNTK trades at $50.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check KNTK's competition here
Euronav N.V. (NYSE: EURN)
ET vs EURN Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check EURN's competition here
SunocoCorp LLC (NYSE: SUNC)
ET vs SUNC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SUNC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while SUNC trades at $74.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SUNC's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SUNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SUNC's competition here
Crestwood Equity Partners LP (NYSE: CEQP)
ET vs CEQP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check CEQP's competition here
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (NYSE: DKL)
ET vs DKL Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while DKL trades at $53.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DKL's ROE of -9.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DKL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DKL's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS)
ET vs NS Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NS's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS-PB)
ET vs NS-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NS-PB's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE: NS-PA)
ET vs NS-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NS-PA's competition here
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: HEP)
ET vs HEP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check HEP's competition here
Seapeak LLC (NYSE: SEAL-PA)
ET vs SEAL-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is 55.76. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SEAL-PA's competition here
Seapeak LLC (NYSE: SEAL-PB)
ET vs SEAL-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is 55.74. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SEAL-PB's competition here
Dorian LPG Ltd. (NYSE: LPG)
ET vs LPG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while LPG trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check LPG's competition here
NuStar Energy L.P. 9.00% CUM PFD C (NYSE: NS-PC)
ET vs NS-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NS-PC's competition here
Rattler Midstream LP (NASDAQ: RTLR)
ET vs RTLR Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check RTLR's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL-PB)
ET vs NGL-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NGL-PB trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NGL-PB's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL-PC)
ET vs NGL-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NGL-PC trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.15. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NGL-PC's competition here
NuStar Logistics, L.P. SB NT FX/FL 43 (NYSE: NSS)
ET vs NSS Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NSS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NSS trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NSS's P/E ratio is -508.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to NSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NSS's competition here
NGL Energy Partners LP (NYSE: NGL)
ET vs NGL Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NGL trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NGL's competition here
Genesis Energy, L.P. (NYSE: GEL)
ET vs GEL Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GEL trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is 73.95. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEL's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GEL's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP)
ET vs GLP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GLP trades at $46.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLP's competition here
Permian Basin Royalty Trust (NYSE: PBT)
ET vs PBT Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while PBT trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 93.70. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBT's ROE of +99.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PBT's competition here
GasLog Ltd. (NYSE: GLOG-PA)
ET vs GLOG-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOG-PA's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN)
ET vs TEN Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TEN trades at $47.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TEN's competition here
Teekay Corporation (NYSE: TK)
ET vs TK Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TK trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TK's competition here
Sabine Royalty Trust (NYSE: SBR)
ET vs SBR Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while SBR trades at $70.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SBR's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP-PA)
ET vs GLP-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLP-PA's competition here
Crestwood Equity Partners LP (NYSE: CEQP-P)
ET vs CEQP-P Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check CEQP-P's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PE)
ET vs TNP-PE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TNP-PE's competition here
New Fortress Energy Inc. Series A Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock (NASDAQ: NFEGP)
ET vs NFEGP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NFEGP has a market cap of 982M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NFEGP trades at $375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NFEGP's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NFEGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NFEGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NFEGP's competition here
Global Partners LP (NYSE: GLP-PB)
ET vs GLP-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 863M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GLP-PB trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLP-PB's competition here
WhiteHawk Minerals Corp (NYSE: WHK)
ET vs WHK Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, WHK has a market cap of 592.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while WHK trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WHK's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WHK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check WHK's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP)
ET vs TNP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TNP's competition here
Summit Midstream Corp. (NYSE: SMC)
ET vs SMC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 422.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while SMC trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -27.56. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SMC's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PB)
ET vs GLOP-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 411.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PB trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.03. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOP-PB's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PC)
ET vs GLOP-PC Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 410.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOP-PC's competition here
Summit Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: SMLP)
ET vs SMLP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMLP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SMLP's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP-PA)
ET vs GLOP-PA Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 404.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is 36.55. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOP-PA's competition here
Diamond S Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSSI)
ET vs DSSI Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DSSI's competition here
Evolve Transition Infrastructure LP (AMEX: SNMP)
ET vs SNMP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check SNMP's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PF)
ET vs TNP-PF Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TNP-PF's competition here
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TNP-PD)
ET vs TNP-PD Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TNP-PD's competition here
Green Plains Partners LP (NASDAQ: GPP)
ET vs GPP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPP's ROE of +26.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GPP's competition here
GasLog Partners LP (NYSE: GLOP)
ET vs GLOP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check GLOP's competition here
Brooge Energy Limited (NASDAQ: BROG)
ET vs BROG Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 232.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while BROG trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BROG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check BROG's competition here
Imperial Petroleum Inc. (NASDAQ: IMPP)
ET vs IMPP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while IMPP trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check IMPP's competition here
Imperial Petroleum Inc. (NASDAQ: IMPPP)
ET vs IMPPP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 180.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while IMPPP trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check IMPPP's competition here
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: MMLP)
ET vs MMLP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while MMLP trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MMLP's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG-PB)
ET vs DLNG-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DLNG-PB's competition here
New Fortress Energy Inc. (NASDAQ: NFE)
ET vs NFE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while NFE trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NFE's ROE of -17.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check NFE's competition here
TMD Energy Limited (AMEX: TMDE)
ET vs TMDE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while TMDE trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check TMDE's competition here
Robin Energy Ltd. Common Stock When Issued (NASDAQ: RBNEV)
ET vs RBNEV Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, RBNEV has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while RBNEV trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas RBNEV's P/E ratio is -18.13. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBNEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RBNEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check RBNEV's competition here
CBL International Limited (NASDAQ: BANL)
ET vs BANL Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while BANL trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -98.89. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check BANL's competition here
Marine Petroleum Trust (NASDAQ: MARPS)
ET vs MARPS Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while MARPS trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check MARPS's competition here
Robin Energy Ltd. (NASDAQ: RBNE)
ET vs RBNE Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 417.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while RBNE trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBNE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check RBNE's competition here
Brooge Energy Limited (NASDAQ: BROGW)
ET vs BROGW Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BROGW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check BROGW's competition here
Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
ET vs WPZ Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, WPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while WPZ trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WPZ's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WPZ's ROE of -290.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to WPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check WPZ's competition here
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings, LLC (NYSE: CQH)
ET vs CQH Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, CQH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while CQH trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CQH's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CQH's ROE of -4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to CQH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check CQH's competition here
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE: ETP)
ET vs ETP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ETP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ETP trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ETP's P/E ratio is -134.62. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ETP's ROE of +15.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ETP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ETP's competition here
EnLink Midstream Partners, LP (NYSE: ENLK)
ET vs ENLK Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, ENLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while ENLK trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ENLK's P/E ratio is -25.64. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENLK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to ENLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check ENLK's competition here
EQGP Holdings, LP (NYSE: EQGP)
ET vs EQGP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, EQGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while EQGP trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas EQGP's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EQGP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to EQGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check EQGP's competition here
Oasis Midstream Partners LP (NASDAQ: OMP)
ET vs OMP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, OMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while OMP trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check OMP's competition here
DCP Midstream, LP 7.875 CUM RED B (NYSE: DCP-PB)
ET vs DCP-PB Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, DCP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while DCP-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas DCP-PB's P/E ratio is 255.10. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DCP-PB's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to DCP-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check DCP-PB's competition here
PBF Logistics LP (NYSE: PBFX)
ET vs PBFX Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, PBFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while PBFX trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PBFX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PBFX's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is less volatile compared to PBFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check PBFX's competition here
Valero Energy Partners LP (NYSE: VLP)
ET vs VLP Comparison September 2026
Energy Transfer LP (NYSE: ET) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ET stands at 69.1B. In comparison, VLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ET is priced at $19.93 on the NYSE, while VLP trades at $42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ET currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas VLP's P/E ratio is 45.91. In terms of profitability, ET's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ET is more volatile compared to VLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ET.Check VLP's competition here