CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTO-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTO-PA | $21.00 | +0.17% | 690.7M | 6.57 | $3.19 | +7.62% |
| WPC | $73.98 | +0.54% | 16.5B | 31.60 | $2.34 | +4.97% |
| EPRT | $29.67 | -0.13% | 6.4B | 23.35 | $1.27 | +4.14% |
| SRC | $42.98 | +0.63% | 6.1B | 24.42 | $1.76 | +6.20% |
| BNL | $20.22 | +0.20% | 3.9B | 31.12 | $0.65 | +5.75% |
| SRC-PA | $24.26 | +0.46% | 3.8B | 13.55 | $1.79 | +6.20% |
| AFINP | $25.91 | -1.78% | 3.4B | -90.91 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| AFINO | $25.66 | +0.08% | 3.4B | -90.04 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| PSB-PY | $11.95 | +0.00% | 3B | 2.97 | $4.02 | +2.36% |
| UE | $22.35 | +0.90% | 2.8B | 26.29 | $0.85 | +3.50% |
Stock Comparison
CTO-PA vs WPC Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while WPC trades at $73.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check WPC's competition here
CTO-PA vs EPRT Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while EPRT trades at $29.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check EPRT's competition here
CTO-PA vs SRC Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while SRC trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check SRC's competition here
CTO-PA vs BNL Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while BNL trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check BNL's competition here
CTO-PA vs SRC-PA Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check SRC-PA's competition here
CTO-PA vs AFINP Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while AFINP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check AFINP's competition here
CTO-PA vs AFINO Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while AFINO trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check AFINO's competition here
CTO-PA vs PSB-PY Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check PSB-PY's competition here
CTO-PA vs UE Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while UE trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check UE's competition here
CTO-PA vs RTLPO Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check RTLPO's competition here
CTO-PA vs RTLPP Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check RTLPP's competition here
CTO-PA vs NYMTG Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, NYMTG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while NYMTG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas NYMTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NYMTG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check NYMTG's competition here
CTO-PA vs GNL Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GNL trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GNL's competition here
CTO-PA vs GNL-PA Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GNL-PA trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -167.21. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GNL-PA's competition here
CTO-PA vs AAT Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while AAT trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 79.53. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check AAT's competition here
CTO-PA vs CLNY Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, CLNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while CLNY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas CLNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to CLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check CLNY's competition here
CTO-PA vs CLNC Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while CLNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check CLNC's competition here
CTO-PA vs AFIN Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while AFIN trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check AFIN's competition here
CTO-PA vs RTL Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while RTL trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check RTL's competition here
CTO-PA vs SAFE Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while SAFE trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check SAFE's competition here
CTO-PA vs GOODN Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GOODN trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -666.18. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GOODN's competition here
CTO-PA vs ESRT Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 902.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while ESRT trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check ESRT's competition here
CTO-PA vs PKST Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 780.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while PKST trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -15.66. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is more volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check PKST's competition here
CTO-PA vs STAR-PG Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA and STAR-PG have similar daily volatility (0.14).Check STAR-PG's competition here
CTO-PA vs STAR-PI Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check STAR-PI's competition here
CTO-PA vs STAR-PD Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check STAR-PD's competition here
CTO-PA vs BRSP Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 726.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while BRSP trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -20.65. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check BRSP's competition here
CTO-PA vs CTO Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, CTO has a market cap of 678.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while CTO trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas CTO's P/E ratio is 100.40. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to CTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check CTO's competition here
CTO-PA vs STAR Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while STAR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check STAR's competition here
CTO-PA vs GOODO Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 625.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GOODO trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 699.48. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GOODO's competition here
CTO-PA vs GOOD Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 610.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GOOD trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 70.11. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GOOD's competition here
CTO-PA vs AHH Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 541.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while AHH trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check AHH's competition here
CTO-PA vs OLP Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 516.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while OLP trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check OLP's competition here
CTO-PA vs GNL-PD Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 513.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GNL-PD trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GNL-PD's competition here
CTO-PA vs GNL-PE Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 498.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GNL-PE trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GNL-PE's competition here
CTO-PA vs GNL-PB Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 465.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GNL-PB trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -158.24. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GNL-PB's competition here
CTO-PA vs FVR Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while FVR trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -114.56. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check FVR's competition here
CTO-PA vs MDV-PA Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 255.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while MDV-PA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -16.17. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check MDV-PA's competition here
CTO-PA vs AHH-PA Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 180.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while AHH-PA trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check AHH-PA's competition here
CTO-PA vs MDRRP Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check MDRRP's competition here
CTO-PA vs MDRR Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while MDRR trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDRR's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check MDRR's competition here
CTO-PA vs SQFTP Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while SQFTP trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check SQFTP's competition here
CTO-PA vs MKZR Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while MKZR trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check MKZR's competition here
CTO-PA vs DPRE Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, DPRE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while DPRE trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas DPRE's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DPRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to DPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check DPRE's competition here
CTO-PA vs SQFT Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while SQFT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check SQFT's competition here
CTO-PA vs CORR-PA Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check CORR-PA's competition here
CTO-PA vs CORR Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while CORR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORR's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check CORR's competition here
CTO-PA vs GIPR Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GIPR trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIPR's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GIPR's competition here
CTO-PA vs GIPRW Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 234.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GIPRW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is more volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GIPRW's competition here
CTO-PA vs SQFTW Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 25.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while SQFTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check SQFTW's competition here
CTO-PA vs APTS Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, APTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while APTS trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas APTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APTS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is more volatile compared to APTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check APTS's competition here
CTO-PA vs NRF Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, NRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while NRF trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas NRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to NRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check NRF's competition here
CTO-PA vs VER-PF Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, VER-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while VER-PF trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas VER-PF's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VER-PF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is more volatile compared to VER-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check VER-PF's competition here
CTO-PA vs VER Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, VER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while VER trades at $51.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas VER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to VER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check VER's competition here
CTO-PA vs GOODM Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, GOODM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while GOODM trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas GOODM's P/E ratio is 1042.08. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is more volatile compared to GOODM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check GOODM's competition here
CTO-PA vs MGP Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, MGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while MGP trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas MGP's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to MGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check MGP's competition here
CTO-PA vs STOR Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, STOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while STOR trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas STOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STOR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is more volatile compared to STOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check STOR's competition here
CTO-PA vs FSPR Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, FSPR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while FSPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas FSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is more volatile compared to FSPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check FSPR's competition here
CTO-PA vs PSB-PX Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, PSB-PX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while PSB-PX trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas PSB-PX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to PSB-PX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check PSB-PX's competition here
CTO-PA vs PSB Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, PSB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while PSB trades at $187.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas PSB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is more volatile compared to PSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check PSB's competition here
CTO-PA vs PSB-PZ Comparison June 2026
CTO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO-PA stands at 690.7M. In comparison, PSB-PZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO-PA is priced at $21.00, while PSB-PZ trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 6.57, whereas PSB-PZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO-PA is less volatile compared to PSB-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO-PA.Check PSB-PZ's competition here