CNO Financial Group, Inc. (CNO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNO | $47.91 | +1.68% | 4.5B | 19.31 | $2.48 | +1.42% |
| MFC | $38.71 | +0.55% | 64.9B | 15.43 | $2.51 | +3.46% |
| AFL | $118.24 | +2.56% | 60.2B | 13.51 | $8.75 | +2.01% |
| MET | $84.49 | +1.23% | 54.4B | 16.35 | $5.17 | +2.72% |
| MET-PE | $22.01 | -0.72% | 46.4B | 2.82 | $7.81 | +2.72% |
| MET-PA | $21.92 | -0.81% | 42.6B | 2.81 | $7.81 | +2.72% |
| PRU | $104.62 | +1.26% | 36.3B | 10.78 | $9.71 | +5.27% |
| PUK | $25.49 | -2.37% | 32.3B | 8.30 | $3.07 | +2.10% |
| UNM | $86.84 | +2.27% | 13.9B | 18.80 | $4.62 | +2.13% |
| GL | $159.18 | +3.16% | 12.4B | 11.03 | $14.44 | +0.72% |
Stock Comparison
CNO vs MFC Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while MFC trades at $38.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MFC's competition here
CNO vs AFL Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while AFL trades at $118.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AFL's competition here
CNO vs MET Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while MET trades at $84.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MET's competition here
CNO vs MET-PE Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while MET-PE trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MET-PE's competition here
CNO vs MET-PA Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while MET-PA trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MET-PA's competition here
CNO vs PRU Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while PRU trades at $104.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check PRU's competition here
CNO vs PUK Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while PUK trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check PUK's competition here
CNO vs UNM Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while UNM trades at $86.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check UNM's competition here
CNO vs GL Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while GL trades at $159.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check GL's competition here
CNO vs MET-PF Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while MET-PF trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MET-PF's competition here
CNO vs PRI Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while PRI trades at $265.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check PRI's competition here
CNO vs PRH Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while PRH trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check PRH's competition here
CNO vs PRS Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while PRS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check PRS's competition here
CNO vs JXN Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while JXN trades at $107.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -17.97. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check JXN's competition here
CNO vs LNC Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while LNC trades at $34.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check LNC's competition here
CNO vs LNC-PD Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while LNC-PD trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check LNC-PD's competition here
CNO vs AEL Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AEL's competition here
CNO vs FGN Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while FGN trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check FGN's competition here
CNO vs FG Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while FG trades at $27.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check FG's competition here
CNO vs BHF Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while BHF trades at $62.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is -20.41. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHF's competition here
CNO vs GNW Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while GNW trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check GNW's competition here
CNO vs BHFAP Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while BHFAP trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHFAP's competition here
CNO vs ABLLL Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while ABLLL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check ABLLL's competition here
CNO vs BHFAL Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while BHFAL trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHFAL's competition here
CNO vs MLCIL Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while MLCIL trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MLCIL's competition here
CNO vs AEL-PB Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AEL-PB's competition here
CNO vs NWLI Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check NWLI's competition here
CNO vs AEL-PA Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AEL-PA's competition here
CNO vs JXN-PA Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while JXN-PA trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check JXN-PA's competition here
CNO vs MHNC Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while MHNC trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MHNC's competition here
CNO vs GL-PD Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while GL-PD trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check GL-PD's competition here
CNO vs LIFE Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while LIFE trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check LIFE's competition here
CNO vs BHFAO Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 903.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while BHFAO trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHFAO's competition here
CNO vs ABX Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 843.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while ABX trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check ABX's competition here
CNO vs ABL Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while ABL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 161.80. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check ABL's competition here
CNO vs BHFAN Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 701.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while BHFAN trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.97. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHFAN's competition here
CNO vs BHFAM Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 626.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while BHFAM trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.87. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check BHFAM's competition here
CNO vs ABLLW Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check ABLLW's competition here
CNO vs CIA Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 259.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while CIA trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check CIA's competition here
CNO vs VERY Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check VERY's competition here
CNO vs MDWT Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MDWT's competition here
CNO vs AAME Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while AAME trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check AAME's competition here
CNO vs IHC Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check IHC's competition here
CNO vs PNX Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PNX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while PNX trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas PNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to PNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check PNX's competition here
CNO vs SFG Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while SFG trades at $22,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas SFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to SFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check SFG's competition here
CNO vs LFC Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check LFC's competition here
CNO vs MLG Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check MLG's competition here
CNO vs GWGH Comparison June 2026
CNO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNO is priced at $47.91, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNO currently has a P/E ratio of 19.31, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CNO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CNO is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNO.Check GWGH's competition here