Calumet, Inc. (CLMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLMT | $35.24 | -5.69% | 3.3B | -17.32 | -$2.16 | N/A |
| COP | $117.57 | -1.24% | 145.3B | 20.24 | $5.89 | +2.77% |
| CNQ | $45.98 | -3.59% | 99.4B | 12.22 | $3.90 | +3.65% |
| EOG | $138.86 | -1.87% | 75B | 13.85 | $10.17 | +2.87% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $57.27 | -3.97% | 58.3B | 79.26 | $0.74 | +1.68% |
| FANG | $195.90 | -6.98% | 57.1B | 209.23 | $0.97 | +2.03% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.34% |
| WDS | $21.43 | -4.03% | 42.3B | 15.71 | $1.42 | +5.01% |
| OXY-WT | $35.32 | -6.11% | 36.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.68% |
Stock Comparison
CLMT vs COP Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while COP trades at $117.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check COP's competition here
CLMT vs CNQ Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CNQ trades at $45.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CNQ's competition here
CLMT vs EOG Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while EOG trades at $138.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check EOG's competition here
CLMT vs PXD Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check PXD's competition here
CLMT vs OXY Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while OXY trades at $57.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 79.26. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check OXY's competition here
CLMT vs FANG Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while FANG trades at $195.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 209.23. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check FANG's competition here
CLMT vs HES Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check HES's competition here
CLMT vs WDS Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while WDS trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check WDS's competition here
CLMT vs OXY-WT Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while OXY-WT trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check OXY-WT's competition here
CLMT vs EQT Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while EQT trades at $54.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check EQT's competition here
CLMT vs DVN Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while DVN trades at $44.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check DVN's competition here
CLMT vs TPL Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while TPL trades at $392.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 55.64. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check TPL's competition here
CLMT vs CTRA Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CTRA trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CTRA's competition here
CLMT vs EXE Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while EXE trades at $92.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check EXE's competition here
CLMT vs COG Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check COG's competition here
CLMT vs OVV Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while OVV trades at $57.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check OVV's competition here
CLMT vs MRO Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check MRO's competition here
CLMT vs PR Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while PR trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check PR's competition here
CLMT vs APA Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while APA trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check APA's competition here
CLMT vs AR Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while AR trades at $35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check AR's competition here
CLMT vs CHK Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CHK's competition here
CLMT vs RRC Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while RRC trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check RRC's competition here
CLMT vs CHKEW Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CHKEW's competition here
CLMT vs CHKEZ Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CHKEZ's competition here
CLMT vs CHKEL Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CHKEL's competition here
CLMT vs SM Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while SM trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check SM's competition here
CLMT vs VIST Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while VIST trades at $74.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check VIST's competition here
CLMT vs CHRD Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CHRD trades at $136.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is -134.68. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHRD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CHRD's competition here
CLMT vs SWN Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check SWN's competition here
CLMT vs MTDR Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while MTDR trades at $53.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check MTDR's competition here
CLMT vs CEO Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CEO's competition here
CLMT vs MUR Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while MUR trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 67.80. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check MUR's competition here
CLMT vs CRC Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CRC trades at $59.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CRC's competition here
CLMT vs CPG Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CPG's competition here
CLMT vs MGY Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while MGY trades at $27.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check MGY's competition here
CLMT vs CNX Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CNX trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CNX's competition here
CLMT vs OAS Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check OAS's competition here
CLMT vs DEN Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check DEN's competition here
CLMT vs BCEI Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check BCEI's competition here
CLMT vs CDEV Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CDEV's competition here
CLMT vs ERF Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check ERF's competition here
CLMT vs CRK Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CRK trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CRK's competition here
CLMT vs CRGY Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CRGY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CRGY's competition here
CLMT vs BTE Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while BTE trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check BTE's competition here
CLMT vs VRN Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check VRN's competition here
CLMT vs GPOR Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while GPOR trades at $170.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check GPOR's competition here
CLMT vs ESTE Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check ESTE's competition here
CLMT vs BKV Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while BKV trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check BKV's competition here
CLMT vs BSM Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while BSM trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check BSM's competition here
CLMT vs TALO Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while TALO trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check TALO's competition here
CLMT vs CPE Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CPE's competition here
CLMT vs CIVI Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check CIVI's competition here
CLMT vs NOG Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while NOG trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check NOG's competition here
CLMT vs MNR Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while MNR trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check MNR's competition here
CLMT vs NEXT Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while NEXT trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check NEXT's competition here
CLMT vs STRDW Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check STRDW's competition here
CLMT vs VET Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while VET trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check VET's competition here
CLMT vs KRP Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while KRP trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check KRP's competition here
CLMT vs KOS Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while KOS trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KOS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check KOS's competition here
CLMT vs HHRS Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check HHRS's competition here
CLMT vs DMLP Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while DMLP trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check DMLP's competition here
CLMT vs FLMN Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check FLMN's competition here
CLMT vs SBR Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while SBR trades at $78.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check SBR's competition here
CLMT vs HPK Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while HPK trades at $7.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HPK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check HPK's competition here
CLMT vs DEC Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while DEC trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas DEC's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DEC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to DEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check DEC's competition here
CLMT vs TBN Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 999.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while TBN trades at $34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -19.28. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check TBN's competition here
CLMT vs IMPPP Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 965.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while IMPPP trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.54. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check IMPPP's competition here
CLMT vs SBOW Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check SBOW's competition here
CLMT vs TELL Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check TELL's competition here
CLMT vs OBE Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 815.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while OBE trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 1212.00. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check OBE's competition here
CLMT vs REPX Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 785.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while REPX trades at $35.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check REPX's competition here
CLMT vs TXO Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 762.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while TXO trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check TXO's competition here
CLMT vs VTS Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while VTS trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is -36.29. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check VTS's competition here
CLMT vs ROCC Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check ROCC's competition here
CLMT vs VTLE Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check VTLE's competition here
CLMT vs GRNT Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 657.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while GRNT trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRNT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check GRNT's competition here
CLMT vs WTI Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 609.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while WTI trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WTI's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check WTI's competition here
CLMT vs EGY Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 585.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while EGY trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check EGY's competition here
CLMT vs GPRK Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 583M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while GPRK trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check GPRK's competition here
CLMT vs PVAC Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check PVAC's competition here
CLMT vs SD Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 578.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while SD trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check SD's competition here
CLMT vs GFR Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 433.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while GFR trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is -54.41. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GFR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check GFR's competition here
CLMT vs PNRG Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while PNRG trades at $185.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check PNRG's competition here
CLMT vs GTE Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while GTE trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GTE's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check GTE's competition here
CLMT vs REI Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while REI trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check REI's competition here
CLMT vs BRY Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check BRY's competition here
CLMT vs INR Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 206.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while INR trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check INR's competition here
CLMT vs KGEI Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 200.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while KGEI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check KGEI's competition here
CLMT vs IMPP Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while IMPP trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check IMPP's competition here
CLMT vs AMPY Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while AMPY trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check AMPY's competition here
CLMT vs SJT Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 181.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while SJT trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -195.00. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SJT's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check SJT's competition here
CLMT vs PHX Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check PHX's competition here
CLMT vs EPM Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while EPM trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -37.83. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check EPM's competition here
CLMT vs EPSN Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while EPSN trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EPSN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check EPSN's competition here
CLMT vs ANNA Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while ANNA trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANNA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check ANNA's competition here
CLMT vs EP Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while EP trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EP's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check EP's competition here
CLMT vs SAFX Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while SAFX trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check SAFX's competition here
CLMT vs NRT Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while NRT trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NRT's ROE of +6.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is more volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check NRT's competition here
CLMT vs HUSA Comparison June 2026
CLMT plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLMT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLMT is priced at $35.24, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLMT currently has a P/E ratio of -17.32, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CLMT's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLMT is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLMT.Check HUSA's competition here