Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLDT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Hotel & Motel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLDT | $11.59 | +5.56% | 527.3M | 564.75 | $0.02 | +3.28% |
| HST | $24.69 | +3.50% | 16.7B | 16.63 | $1.47 | +3.92% |
| RHP | $119.33 | +4.80% | 7.4B | 30.81 | $3.80 | +4.02% |
| DRH-PA | $24.99 | +0.04% | 5.1B | -225.14 | -$0.11 | +3.56% |
| SHO-PH | $21.50 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 58.04 | $0.37 | +3.14% |
| SHO-PI | $21.19 | -0.19% | 4B | 57.41 | $0.37 | +3.14% |
| RLJ-PA | $25.37 | +0.12% | 3.9B | -15.55 | -$1.63 | +5.67% |
| APLE | $15.80 | +3.98% | 3.7B | 21.48 | $0.73 | +6.14% |
| PK | $14.18 | +4.88% | 2.8B | -12.88 | -$1.09 | +7.14% |
| DRH | $11.68 | +3.77% | 2.4B | 25.09 | $0.46 | +3.56% |
Stock Comparison
CLDT vs HST Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, HST has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while HST trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas HST's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HST's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to HST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HST's competition here
CLDT vs RHP Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, RHP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while RHP trades at $119.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas RHP's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RHP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to RHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check RHP's competition here
CLDT vs DRH-PA Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, DRH-PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while DRH-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas DRH-PA's P/E ratio is -225.14. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRH-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to DRH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check DRH-PA's competition here
CLDT vs SHO-PH Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, SHO-PH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while SHO-PH trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas SHO-PH's P/E ratio is 58.04. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO-PH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to SHO-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SHO-PH's competition here
CLDT vs SHO-PI Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, SHO-PI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while SHO-PI trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas SHO-PI's P/E ratio is 57.41. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to SHO-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SHO-PI's competition here
CLDT vs RLJ-PA Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, RLJ-PA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while RLJ-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas RLJ-PA's P/E ratio is -15.55. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLJ-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to RLJ-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check RLJ-PA's competition here
CLDT vs APLE Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, APLE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while APLE trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas APLE's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APLE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to APLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check APLE's competition here
CLDT vs PK Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, PK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while PK trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas PK's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PK's competition here
CLDT vs DRH Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, DRH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while DRH trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas DRH's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to DRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check DRH's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PG Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, PEB-PG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while PEB-PG trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas PEB-PG's P/E ratio is -11.99. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to PEB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PG's competition here
CLDT vs SHO Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, SHO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while SHO trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas SHO's P/E ratio is 104.50. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to SHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SHO's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PH Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, PEB-PH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while PEB-PH trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas PEB-PH's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to PEB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PH's competition here
CLDT vs PEB Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, PEB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while PEB trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas PEB's P/E ratio is -21.32. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to PEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB's competition here
CLDT vs INN-PE Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, INN-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while INN-PE trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas INN-PE's P/E ratio is -30.69. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN-PE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to INN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check INN-PE's competition here
CLDT vs XHR Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, XHR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while XHR trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas XHR's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XHR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to XHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check XHR's competition here
CLDT vs RLJ Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, RLJ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while RLJ trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas RLJ's P/E ratio is -527.00. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to RLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check RLJ's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PE Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, PEB-PE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while PEB-PE trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas PEB-PE's P/E ratio is -12.03. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to PEB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PE's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PF Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, PEB-PF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while PEB-PF trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas PEB-PF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to PEB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PF's competition here
CLDT vs CLDT-PA Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, CLDT-PA has a market cap of 978M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while CLDT-PA trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas CLDT-PA's P/E ratio is -27.03. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLDT-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to CLDT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check CLDT-PA's competition here
CLDT vs HT-PE Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, HT-PE has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while HT-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas HT-PE's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to HT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HT-PE's competition here
CLDT vs HT-PD Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, HT-PD has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while HT-PD trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas HT-PD's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to HT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HT-PD's competition here
CLDT vs HT-PC Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, HT-PC has a market cap of 722.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while HT-PC trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas HT-PC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to HT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HT-PC's competition here
CLDT vs INN Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, INN has a market cap of 644.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while INN trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas INN's P/E ratio is -21.23. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to INN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check INN's competition here
CLDT vs HT Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, HT has a market cap of 482.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while HT trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas HT's P/E ratio is 66.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to HT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HT's competition here
CLDT vs INN-PF Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, INN-PF has a market cap of 317.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while INN-PF trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas INN-PF's P/E ratio is -29.05. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN-PF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to INN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check INN-PF's competition here
CLDT vs SVC Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, SVC has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while SVC trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas SVC's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to SVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SVC's competition here
CLDT vs SOHON Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, SOHON has a market cap of 266.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while SOHON trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas SOHON's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHON's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to SOHON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SOHON's competition here
CLDT vs SOHOB Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, SOHOB has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while SOHOB trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas SOHOB's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to SOHOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SOHOB's competition here
CLDT vs SOHOO Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, SOHOO has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while SOHOO trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas SOHOO's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to SOHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SOHOO's competition here
CLDT vs BHR-PB Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, BHR-PB has a market cap of 174.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while BHR-PB trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas BHR-PB's P/E ratio is -51.49. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR-PB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to BHR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check BHR-PB's competition here
CLDT vs BHR Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, BHR has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while BHR trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas BHR's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to BHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check BHR's competition here
CLDT vs BHR-PD Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, BHR-PD has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while BHR-PD trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas BHR-PD's P/E ratio is -56.28. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR-PD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to BHR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check BHR-PD's competition here
CLDT vs SOHO Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, SOHO has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while SOHO trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas SOHO's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to SOHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SOHO's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PD Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, AHT-PD has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while AHT-PD trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas AHT-PD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PD's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to AHT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PD's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PF Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, AHT-PF has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while AHT-PF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas AHT-PF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to AHT-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PF's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PG Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, AHT-PG has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while AHT-PG trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas AHT-PG's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to AHT-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PG's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PI Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, AHT-PI has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while AHT-PI trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas AHT-PI's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PI's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to AHT-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PI's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PH Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, AHT-PH has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while AHT-PH trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas AHT-PH's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PH's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to AHT-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PH's competition here
CLDT vs AHT Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, AHT has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while AHT trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas AHT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to AHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT's competition here
CLDT vs IHT Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, IHT has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while IHT trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas IHT's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IHT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to IHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check IHT's competition here
CLDT vs CPLG Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, CPLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while CPLG trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas CPLG's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPLG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to CPLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check CPLG's competition here
CLDT vs CDOR Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, CDOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while CDOR trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas CDOR's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDOR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to CDOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check CDOR's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PD Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, PEB-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while PEB-PD trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas PEB-PD's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to PEB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PD's competition here
CLDT vs FCH Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, FCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while FCH trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas FCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to FCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check FCH's competition here
CLDT vs LHO Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, LHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while LHO trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas LHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LHO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to LHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check LHO's competition here
CLDT vs MHGC Comparison June 2026
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 527.3M. In comparison, MHGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $11.59, while MHGC trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 564.75, whereas MHGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHGC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to MHGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check MHGC's competition here