Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CDUAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDUAF | $36.70 | +1.97% | 7.5B | 524.22 | $0.07 | +3.62% |
| IBDSF | $22.95 | +0.95% | 155B | 24.66 | $0.93 | +2.11% |
| IBDRY | $91.58 | +0.91% | 150.5B | 24.62 | $3.72 | +3.43% |
| ESOCF | $11.51 | -1.41% | 114.2B | 26.16 | $0.44 | +4.95% |
| ENLAY | $11.06 | -0.48% | 109.5B | 25.08 | $0.44 | +5.13% |
| ENGQF | $31.76 | +4.68% | 80.7B | 18.05 | $1.76 | +3.80% |
| ENGIY | $31.09 | -0.19% | 78.8B | 17.64 | $1.76 | +5.00% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69B | 81.27 | $2.38 | N/A |
| ENAKF | $22.07 | +8.08% | 57.7B | 14.52 | $1.52 | +3.03% |
| EONGY | $21.04 | -0.24% | 55B | 13.84 | $1.52 | +3.16% |
Stock Comparison
CDUAF vs IBDSF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IBDSF has a market cap of 155B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while IBDSF trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas IBDSF's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IBDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to IBDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check IBDSF's competition here
CDUAF vs IBDRY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 150.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while IBDRY trades at $91.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check IBDRY's competition here
CDUAF vs ESOCF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ESOCF trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ESOCF's competition here
CDUAF vs ENLAY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 109.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ENLAY trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ENLAY's competition here
CDUAF vs ENGQF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 80.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ENGQF trades at $31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ENGQF's competition here
CDUAF vs ENGIY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ENGIY trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ENGIY's competition here
CDUAF vs PPWLM Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to PPWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check PPWLM's competition here
CDUAF vs ENAKF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ENAKF trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to ENAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ENAKF's competition here
CDUAF vs EONGY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while EONGY trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check EONGY's competition here
CDUAF vs PPWLO Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check PPWLO's competition here
CDUAF vs ECIFF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to ECIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ECIFF's competition here
CDUAF vs ECIFY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to ECIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ECIFY's competition here
CDUAF vs SSEZF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while SSEZF trades at $33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to SSEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check SSEZF's competition here
CDUAF vs SSEZY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while SSEZY trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check SSEZY's competition here
CDUAF vs EDPFY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while EDPFY trades at $50.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check EDPFY's competition here
CDUAF vs ELCPF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ELCPF trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to ELCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ELCPF's competition here
CDUAF vs CHUEF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while CHUEF trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check CHUEF's competition here
CDUAF vs AEMMY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while AEMMY trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check AEMMY's competition here
CDUAF vs AEMMF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while AEMMF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check AEMMF's competition here
CDUAF vs CDUUF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to CDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check CDUUF's competition here
CDUAF vs HRASF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while HRASF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check HRASF's competition here
CDUAF vs CNAUF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CNAUF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while CNAUF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas CNAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNAUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to CNAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check CNAUF's competition here
CDUAF vs ACLTF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ACLTF trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ACLTF's competition here
CDUAF vs ACLLF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ACLLF trades at $51.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 51.49. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ACLLF's competition here
CDUAF vs ACEJF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ACEJF's competition here
CDUAF vs CDUTF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check CDUTF's competition here
CDUAF vs CUTLF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while CUTLF trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check CUTLF's competition here
CDUAF vs IRDEY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while IRDEY trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check IRDEY's competition here
CDUAF vs IRDEF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while IRDEF trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check IRDEF's competition here
CDUAF vs CNUTF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while CNUTF trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check CNUTF's competition here
CDUAF vs CSGEF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while CSGEF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check CSGEF's competition here
CDUAF vs VETTF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while VETTF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check VETTF's competition here
CDUAF vs GLVNF Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to GLVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check GLVNF's competition here
CDUAF vs ARAO Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 27.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check ARAO's competition here
CDUAF vs PBEV Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to PBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check PBEV's competition here
CDUAF vs CMNR Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check CMNR's competition here
CDUAF vs EVNVY Comparison June 2026
CDUAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDUAF stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EVNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDUAF is priced at $36.70, while EVNVY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDUAF currently has a P/E ratio of 524.22, whereas EVNVY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, CDUAF's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EVNVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDUAF is more volatile compared to EVNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDUAF.Check EVNVY's competition here