ADT Inc. (ADT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ADT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADT | $6.81 | +2.25% | 5B | 8.87 | $0.76 | +3.28% |
| ALLE | $130.10 | -0.01% | 11.2B | 17.82 | $7.32 | +1.60% |
| MSA | $161.26 | -2.02% | 6.2B | 21.79 | $7.41 | +1.32% |
| REZI | $31.58 | +6.15% | 4.6B | -8.45 | -$3.58 | N/A |
| BRC | $88.53 | +0.43% | 4.2B | 20.25 | $4.40 | +1.10% |
| BCO | $101.95 | +1.06% | 4.2B | 23.59 | $4.28 | +1.01% |
| GEO | $25.36 | +7.44% | 3.4B | 12.77 | $1.97 | N/A |
| VVNT | $12.00 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ARLO | $13.03 | +1.01% | 1.4B | 46.25 | $0.28 | N/A |
| NSSC | $35.35 | -1.78% | 1.3B | 34.73 | $1.03 | +1.59% |
Stock Comparison
ADT vs ALLE Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while ALLE trades at $130.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check ALLE's competition here
ADT vs MSA Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while MSA trades at $161.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check MSA's competition here
ADT vs REZI Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while REZI trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REZI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check REZI's competition here
ADT vs BRC Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while BRC trades at $88.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check BRC's competition here
ADT vs BCO Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while BCO trades at $101.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check BCO's competition here
ADT vs GEO Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while GEO trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check GEO's competition here
ADT vs VVNT Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check VVNT's competition here
ADT vs ARLO Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while ARLO trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is 46.25. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARLO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check ARLO's competition here
ADT vs NSSC Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while NSSC trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check NSSC's competition here
ADT vs EVLV Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while EVLV trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -28.73. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check EVLV's competition here
ADT vs MG Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 588.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while MG trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check MG's competition here
ADT vs CIX Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while CIX trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check CIX's competition here
ADT vs NL Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 297.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while NL trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas NL's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check NL's competition here
ADT vs BAER Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 118.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while BAER trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check BAER's competition here
ADT vs SNT Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while SNT trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check SNT's competition here
ADT vs NXTD Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check NXTD's competition here
ADT vs SPCB Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while SPCB trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check SPCB's competition here
ADT vs KSCP Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while KSCP trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check KSCP's competition here
ADT vs EVLVW Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while EVLVW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check EVLVW's competition here
ADT vs UUU Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while UUU trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -102.43. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check UUU's competition here
ADT vs BAERW Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while BAERW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check BAERW's competition here
ADT vs GFAI Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while GFAI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check GFAI's competition here
ADT vs SUGP Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while SUGP trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUGP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check SUGP's competition here
ADT vs VRME Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while VRME trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check VRME's competition here
ADT vs CIGL Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while CIGL trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -13.27. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIGL's ROE of -35.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check CIGL's competition here
ADT vs BKYI Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while BKYI trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check BKYI's competition here
ADT vs GFAIW Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while GFAIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check GFAIW's competition here
ADT vs IVDAW Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while IVDAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check IVDAW's competition here
ADT vs IVDA Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 949.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while IVDA trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check IVDA's competition here
ADT vs LGMK Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 944.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while LGMK trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check LGMK's competition here
ADT vs VRMEW Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check VRMEW's competition here
ADT vs LOJN Comparison June 2026
ADT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADT stands at 5B. In comparison, LOJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ADT is priced at $6.81, while LOJN trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADT currently has a P/E ratio of 8.87, whereas LOJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LOJN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADT is more volatile compared to LOJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADT.Check LOJN's competition here